fbpx

comments2

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying 30 random comments. Click here to see more.

Submitted
first-name
support
top-concern
message
template
2024-11-16 13:23:52 +02:00
kevin
No I do not
All of the above
It's a Trojan house, over policing and allows for the existence of diabolical things like pedophiles having the right to relation with kids of consenting age and then reducing the age to as low as they can in other regulations or legislature
No I do not
2024-11-05 09:58:53 +02:00
Dawn
No I do not
All of the above
This is beyond insanity. A democratic right is freedom of speech or is free speech only allowed if it concerns with a corrupt government? LEAVE TGE CHILDREN OUT OF THIS BILL
Yes I do
2024-10-25 10:53:51 +02:00
Relson
No I do not
The Bill is vague and ambiguous
No I do not
2024-10-24 17:11:41 +02:00
Marion
No I do not
The Bill is unnecessary
Yes I do
2024-10-24 08:24:26 +02:00
Lee
No I do not
All of the above
All speech should be free. Not just the speech the government LIkES.
If you have a mind you should be able to speak it.
Malema gets away with it every single time! But it’s already rules for thee but not for me with this government.
No I do not
2024-10-15 20:23:41 +02:00
Lesley
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-10-12 10:41:52 +02:00
Teresa
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-10-03 18:42:55 +02:00
Aimee-Louise
No I do not
All of the above
The implementation of this Bill may lead to an unreasonable and unjustifiable limitation of our right to freedom of speech given the broad and vague language used. While I acknowledge that at times our rights need to limitednin order to protect the rights of others, the limitations should be necessary and fair. Our existing legislation provides sufficiently against hate speech and the proposed additions are thus not necessary.
Yes I do
2024-10-02 22:36:47 +02:00
Neil
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-10-02 08:50:56 +02:00
Vera
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-10-01 23:41:23 +02:00
Andy
No I do not
All of the above
No I do not
2024-09-16 10:06:36 +02:00
Tiaan
No I do not
All of the above
I completely oppose this Bill, it merely damages our lack of freedom of speech even further. It's anti-human.
Yes I do
2024-09-07 06:42:19 +02:00
Rashied
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-08-25 15:51:56 +02:00
Werner
No I do not
All of the above
Too vague words
No I do not
2024-08-15 14:28:36 +02:00
Carrie
No I do not
All of the above
Hate speech can have innumerable consequences for the population. A joke, a meme , that is intended to be humorous can be termed hate speech. It will probably include monitoring all social media. Revenge and intimidation and just plain language difference misunderstandings will arise
Yes I do
2024-07-04 12:43:41 +02:00
D
No I do not
Other
Another way where free speech and personaql opinion/feeling is being manipulated or oppressed to accomodate everyone except those who actually think logically.
No I do not
2024-06-29 14:13:22 +02:00
Jen
Not fully
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-06-27 08:06:56 +02:00
J
No I do not
The Bill is unnecessary
What is the govt so fearful of?
No I do not
2024-05-29 20:06:19 +02:00
Juliet
No I do not
The Bill is unnecessary
Yes I do
2024-05-19 14:22:42 +02:00
Reinhard
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-05-17 09:06:37 +02:00
Tanya
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-05-10 16:50:20 +02:00
Ingrid
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-05-10 08:16:43 +02:00
Graeme
No I do not
All of the above
Dear Mr President,

The Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Bill (the Bill), passed by the National Assembly on Tuesday, 5 December 2023, refers.

REQUEST:

I am writing to appeal to Your Excellency to send the Bill back to the National Assembly for reconsideration, because of the constitutional concerns below.

CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS ABOUT THE BILL’S DEFINITION OF HATE SPEECH:

The Bill contravenes section 36 of the Constitution, because it is:
Unnecessary as existing laws have already been successfully implemented in various criminal and civil cases of hate speech.

Overbroad: The Bill’s definition of hate speech is broader than the Constitution’s definition of hate speech, criminalising speech the Constitution sees as protected.

The Bill’s definition of hate speech is also broader than the Equality Act’s civil law definition of (civil) hate speech. This will make it easier to be found guilty of a criminal offence and sent to jail for up to five years than to be ordered to e.g. apologise under the Equality Act.

Vague and ambiguous: The Bill’s different elements for the crime of hate speech are either undefined (e.g. hate) or vague and/or ambiguous (e.g. social cohesion).

The Bill also contravenes the Constitution’s founding value of the rule of the law (section 1(c)), because it fails to define the essential element of hate. The result is that citizens are unable to know beforehand whether they are committing a crime or not.

OTHER CONCERNS ABOUT THE BILL:

The Bill fails to incorporate the United Nations’ Rabat Plan of Action threshold test (the requirements used to determine culpability for criminal hate speech). Thus it will cause South Africa to break its international law obligations and commitments to: uphold freedom of expression and impose criminal sanctions for hate speech only as a last resort measure in strictly justifiable circumstances.

Thank you
No I do not
2024-04-22 18:48:23 +02:00
Nelisiwe
No I do not
All of the above
This is against our faith and it's an insult to us as SA,what is it that you want to feed our children,what kind of a nation it's going to build,come n don't sign this we are being set up here
No I do not
2024-04-10 08:38:31 +02:00
Musa
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2024-04-06 14:00:47 +02:00
Francina
Not fully
All of the above
No I do not
2024-04-06 10:45:40 +02:00
Umi
No I do not
All of the above
My religious beliefs do not permit such stuff I will teach my own children I don’t want others passing their beliefs on these young minds
Yes I do
2024-04-04 19:28:35 +02:00
Miche
No I do not
All of the above
No I do not
2024-04-03 12:55:52 +02:00
George
No I do not
The Bill is unnecessary
Mhaka leyi yi ta onhela rixaka na ku onhela tiko hinkwaro eka vumundzuku bya rona . Xaniseko wu tava lowu kulu eka tiko hinkwaro.
No I do not
2024-03-22 10:04:49 +02:00
Jutta
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do