Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying 30 random comments. Click here to see more.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message | template |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-09-18 06:24:24 +02:00 | Vic | Yes I do | Constitutionality of the Bill | Yes I do | |
2026-09-17 14:29:34 +02:00 | chris | No I do not | Constitutionality of the Bill | Yes I do | |
2026-09-17 13:09:58 +02:00 | ABRIE | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-09-10 14:31:42 +02:00 | JG | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-09-09 16:34:20 +02:00 | Eloise | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-09-09 10:19:17 +02:00 | Gerhard | No I do not | The broad definition of hate speech | No I do not | |
2026-09-08 10:33:19 +02:00 | W | No I do not | All of the above | Apply these 'laws' equally to everyone and you will see how quickly they will disappear from the statutes. It is utter bullshit and total reverse racism, irrespectively of how it is denied and how it is dressed up as 'redress' or some other ridiculous way of justifying it. | Yes I do |
2026-09-07 11:41:50 +02:00 | Elana | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-09-06 20:30:12 +02:00 | Lourens | No I do not | All of the above | This is hateful to block freedom of speech | Yes I do |
2026-09-06 08:49:14 +02:00 | Nat | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-08-28 10:16:04 +02:00 | Thomas | Not fully | Other | Inconsistent and/or selective application of laws e.g. "Kill the Boer" not regarded as hate speech. Limited prosecutions in respect of races other than White. | No I do not |
2026-08-25 17:04:35 +02:00 | le roux | No I do not | The Bill is vague and ambiguous | This is utter bull. Wiped backsides on segments of population , still do and is just for eye blind. Discrimination against the pale faces are glaringly obvious even to the blind , but pushed into the 30y plans as delaying tactics . Shame on such high aspirations before '94. Now worth less than the effluent down streets . Language rights thrown into long drop as all public announcements in our municipality always in1one lingo . Shame on you too. | Yes I do |
2026-08-19 10:43:09 +02:00 | Sheree | Not fully | The broad definition of hate speech | Further having such a broad and ambiguous bill can be more harmful to a country that has not dealt with the trauma of the past nor have the citizens learnt to deal with conflict in non hateful manners, therefore this will eventually spiral to the point that is is just another piece of paper which cannot be implemented or managed as the judicial system which will need to deal with this is faltering and failing. | Yes I do |
2026-08-17 12:56:21 +02:00 | Karen | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | Yes I do | |
2026-07-09 11:18:53 +02:00 | Dudley | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-06-25 15:14:41 +02:00 | Nike' | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | Yes I do | |
2026-05-26 16:00:47 +02:00 | Kathleen | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-05-25 15:50:27 +02:00 | Hill | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-05-21 14:11:25 +02:00 | Philip | No I do not | All of the above | The Bill will contravene Section 15 of the South African Constitution guarantees everyone the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief, and opinion. This provision ensures that individuals can hold and express their personal beliefs, including religious convictions, without state interference. Sometimes religious beliefs and opinions may offend other groups of people. Being offended is a choice and being offended does not equate to suffering loss or injury, therefore I think this bill is unnecessary and it has the potential for abuse.. | Yes I do |
2026-05-06 18:34:35 +02:00 | Jasper | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | Yes I do | |
2026-04-14 07:04:09 +02:00 | Grant | No I do not | Constitutionality of the Bill | No I do not | |
2026-04-02 11:11:27 +02:00 | Petra | No I do not | The Bill is vague and ambiguous | A cornerstone of justice is that laws must be clear and predictable. Because the Bill fails to strictly define "hate" or "social cohesion," the law becomes a "moving target." This gives the state and prosecutors immense discretionary power to decide what is criminal based on the political or social climate of the day, rather than objective legal standards. | No I do not |
2026-03-22 08:19:39 +02:00 | Hennie | No I do not | The broad definition of hate speech | Yes I do | |
2026-03-20 13:29:12 +02:00 | Lionel | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-03-20 11:08:18 +02:00 | Paul | No I do not | All of the above | No I do not | |
2026-03-19 11:10:40 +02:00 | Lilith | No I do not | Other | This is an irrational bill. | No I do not |
2026-03-18 08:28:29 +02:00 | Eberhardt | No I do not | The Bill is vague and ambiguous | No I do not | |
2026-03-17 16:14:08 +02:00 | Fouche | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-02-04 19:42:11 +02:00 | Niké | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | Yes I do | |
2026-01-08 18:38:55 +02:00 | Michael | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do |