comments

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying 10 latest comments. Click here to see more.

Submitted
first-name
support
top-concern
message
template
2026-07-09 19:14:29 +02:00
Marius
No I do not
All of the above
No I do not
2026-07-09 19:11:32 +02:00
Marius
No I do not
All of the above
No I do not
2026-07-09 11:18:53 +02:00
Dudley
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2026-07-09 11:06:54 +02:00
Natalie
No I do not
Constitutionality of the Bill
Yes I do
2026-07-08 08:59:56 +02:00
Eion
No I do not
All of the above
It is unnecessary, as there is enough legislation in place to cover this! All that additional legislation will achieve, is to cloud the issue and cause confusion! The fact that it is thought to be necessary, is because certain sections of the population are immature, and feel that they are continually being subjected to persecution, because they feel insecure and persecuted because of racial bias and intrinsic feelings of insecurity and being persecuted!!!
Yes I do
2026-06-30 22:09:44 +02:00
Cornelia
No I do not
The Bill is vague and ambiguous
The broad definitions make it difficult to enforce. Enforcement will therefore be highly dependent on who is in power- which is a dangerous position for any group of people to be in.
Yes I do
2026-06-25 15:14:41 +02:00
Nike'
No I do not
The Bill is unnecessary
Yes I do
2026-06-17 17:30:30 +02:00
Rui
No I do not
The broad definition of hate speech
Yes I do
2026-06-11 13:09:05 +02:00
rynhard
No I do not
All of the above
Yes I do
2026-06-04 15:11:47 +02:00
Gayleen
No I do not
All of the above
No I do not

Comments as delivered to the Presidency as of 13 March 2024

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?
Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [16.52 MB]