comments

2026-07-13 21:36:32 +02:00

Marthinus

Not fully

Other

This is utter bull. Wiped backsides on segments of population , still do and is just for eye blind. Discrimination against the pale faces are glaringly obvious even to the blind , but pushed into the 30y plans as delaying tactics . Shame on such high aspirations before '94. Now worth less than the effluent down streets . Language rights thrown into long drop as all public announcements in our municipality always in1one lingo . Shame on you too.

No I do not

2026-07-12 23:16:05 +02:00

PIETER

No I do not

All of the above

Yes I do

2026-07-09 19:14:29 +02:00

Marius

No I do not

All of the above

No I do not

2026-07-09 19:11:32 +02:00

Marius

No I do not

All of the above

No I do not

2026-07-09 11:18:53 +02:00

Dudley

No I do not

All of the above

Yes I do

2026-07-09 11:06:54 +02:00

Natalie

No I do not

Constitutionality of the Bill

Yes I do

2026-07-08 08:59:56 +02:00

Eion

No I do not

All of the above

It is unnecessary, as there is enough legislation in place to cover this! All that additional legislation will achieve, is to cloud the issue and cause confusion! The fact that it is thought to be necessary, is because certain sections of the population are immature, and feel that they are continually being subjected to persecution, because they feel insecure and persecuted because of racial bias and intrinsic feelings of insecurity and being persecuted!!!

Yes I do

2026-06-30 22:09:44 +02:00

Cornelia

No I do not

The Bill is vague and ambiguous

The broad definitions make it difficult to enforce. Enforcement will therefore be highly dependent on who is in power- which is a dangerous position for any group of people to be in.

Yes I do

2026-06-25 15:14:41 +02:00

Nike'

No I do not

The Bill is unnecessary

Yes I do

2026-06-17 17:30:30 +02:00

Rui

No I do not

The broad definition of hate speech

Yes I do