comments2

Displaying 20 latest comments. Click here to see more

first-name
support
message
M.
Yes I do
Cameras should NOT infringe on privacy of homes, nor be linked in any manner or form to privacy of personal information. Cameras should be at every street corner, robots, key entrances to large public spaces, etc. Internationally these have been in service for a long time and have proven to serve the public well.
POINT OF CONCERN: SA GOVT'S PROPOSED BILL OF BIOMETRIC IDENTITY and now suggestion of the CAMERAS....
Shaheen
No I do not
This is the set-up leading to 15 minute cities where we'll be monitored and cannot do it at our free will
Nico
Yes I do
Only if it can reduce crime, if this can be used as evidence in court and can lead to apprehension of perpetrators.
john
No I do not
This is more of the "Nanny state" - it is sold under the pretext of "protecting" us.
The reality is that the government wants more control.
THIS MUST NOT HAPPEN.
Mario
Yes I do
Sonja
Yes I do
elize
No I do not
Coenie
Yes I do
Have a look at CCTV success in Britain, eg. London and surrounds.
It's astonishing to see what difference this could make in our lives
ADELE
Yes I do
If it is monitored correctly our safety will improve
Kevin
Yes I do
Linda
No I do not
Most homes have their own cameras at a great expense!! We will land up paying for this also..which most homes will be unable to afford!!
Boniswa
No I do not
Having private companies especially white owned and managed companies and the biases that will be part of their algorithms is not a good idea. Public safety should be a public good and not a private good. I do not support the installation of a connected camera network in my area especially a private owned network.
Lenette
Yes I do
It is shown that crime decreases when cameras are installed. We are not safe anywhere anymore in South Africa and crime is increasing because of job losses.
Matthew
Yes I do
Toni
No I do not
People are already under constant surveillance, this is just another opportunity for corruption.
Leon
Yes I do
Cameras always help to reduce crime
NJ
Yes I do
Johannes
Yes I do
Vumatel is a for profit company. This means efficiency. However, for profit companies should not operate in an arena where there is no clear government policy. Government policy should safeguard citizens. It is important that goverment develop policy to regulate this activity. This policy should be developed based of best practice and the interest of citizens and should not start with the framework of a for profit company. Whatever is already established should be disregarded when developing the policy and the for profit companies must adapt to meet the regulations once these have been approved by citizens and gone through the rigours of law making.
Pravin
Yes I do
We would like it to be subsidized by the Municipality
Sandy
Yes I do