comments2

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying the 15 latest comments.

view more ...
Submitted
first-name
support
top-concern
message
2026-01-02 18:21:58 +02:00
Sara-Marí
No I do not
Weaponising laws
2026-01-02 18:20:57 +02:00
Yvette
No I do not
Political motivation
2026-01-02 18:19:02 +02:00
Alastair
No I do not
Weaponising laws
2026-01-02 18:18:04 +02:00
Sue
No I do not
Constitutional issues
2026-01-02 18:13:01 +02:00
Viv
No I do not
Political motivation
2026-01-02 18:12:59 +02:00
Viv
No I do not
Political motivation
2026-01-02 18:08:04 +02:00
Jan
No I do not
Constitutional issues
2026-01-02 18:05:03 +02:00
Joseph
No I do not
Political motivation
2026-01-02 18:02:25 +02:00
Stella
No I do not
Other
2026-01-02 17:57:05 +02:00
Gail
No I do not
Political motivation
2026-01-02 17:53:15 +02:00
Fred
No I do not
Weaponising laws
2026-01-02 17:48:39 +02:00
Michael
No I do not
Political motivation
Apart from he obvious difficulty in specifying how "support" will be defined in a narrow and specific enough way to provide absolute distinction as to the breach of law for persecution purposes, the introduction of a law specifically to address sovereign state internal affairs would seem to fall outside the bounds of the requirements of our constitution. To pass judgment on the segregation legality of a foreign state while the current legislation embodying segregation in the current labour laws in this country should rather be addressed and removed from this countries statutes before concerning our country in attempting to weaponize our legislation for narrow political gain and remove focus from internal segregation which has proved to enable a small section of the population at the expense of the greater economy.
2026-01-02 17:46:43 +02:00
helen
No I do not
Other
2026-01-02 17:45:11 +02:00
Kgalalelo
No I do not
Weaponising laws
2026-01-02 17:44:55 +02:00
Patrick
No I do not
Weaponising laws
Have your say