Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-09-25 11:29:10 +02:00 | Devora | No I do not | Constitutional issues | It will be a total infringement on individual rights. |
2026-09-25 10:54:10 +02:00 | Braydon | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-09-25 10:39:59 +02:00 | Eileen | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-09-25 09:29:43 +02:00 | Meryl | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-09-25 07:46:09 +02:00 | Franz | No I do not | Constitutional issues |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.