Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-03-26 09:44:47 +02:00 | Pieter | No I do not | Weaponising laws | This law crushes free speech and criminalizes people who have a different opinion to others. It's starting with the extremist Muslim issue. Where does it end? This bill must not be passed and free speech must endure. |
2026-03-23 08:45:46 +02:00 | Beth | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-03-22 22:40:18 +02:00 | Arlene | No I do not | Weaponising laws | I have lived through Apartheid and will not be forced to forgo my religious beliefs that Israel is the Holy Land and I will not be allowed to go on a pilgrimage to the country. What gives the politicians the right to infringe on our freedom? |
2026-03-20 15:03:20 +02:00 | Leon | No I do not | Weaponising laws | This is so untrue and big a lie that no-one with a bit of common sense, knowing the truth about what goes on in the middle East and know bible history, it does not deserve any comment other to opposite it in its entirety. |
2026-03-19 09:57:31 +02:00 | Petrus | No I do not | Constitutional issues |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.