Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-10-16 05:10:35 +02:00 | Jolene | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-10-16 05:08:31 +02:00 | Alveno | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-10-16 05:06:15 +02:00 | Tania | No I do not | Other | I stand for Christianity and fo not agree wi6this bill |
2026-10-16 04:00:06 +02:00 | Richard | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-10-16 02:20:18 +02:00 | Paula | No I do not | Constitutional issues |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.