Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-11 17:52:51 +02:00 | Leonieke | No I do not | Political motivation | AS usual, a smokescreen to hide more important issued and a total waste of money !!! |
2026-02-11 01:46:16 +02:00 | Brian | No I do not | Political motivation | Politicians have a very narrow age da that does nit represent ge greater public of the republic. We are a Christian nation and therefore can't be dictated afew on religious views that are skewed and none God fearing leaders. Diverting heavy corruption in Government and poor service deliveries and promises that have failed to materialize in decades.. the lives of our people have not improced to the sha.e of so called freedom, And failed BBBEE that benefited the few con exted and using Israell as a decoy . Unacceptable some of us as born and bread in SA proudly support Israel and a God fearing people...we have alot domestically to sort out..as a country we need to withdraw the case in ICC against Israel immediately without any conditions or reservations..it is u erthicL and far reaching beyond our scope as a nation. No I do not support Weaponising laws Subjective criminalisation of the public based on a biased political |
2026-02-10 14:00:53 +02:00 | Andries | No I do not | Weaponising laws | Subjective criminalisation of the public based on a biased political view |
2026-02-09 22:08:02 +02:00 | Greg | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-02-09 20:44:42 +02:00 | Eric | No I do not | Weaponising laws |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.