Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-07-26 15:41:46 +02:00 | Hans | No I do not | Weaponising laws | Israel should be protected, not criminilized. Israel belongs to God, not man. As a Christian, I look forward to the day of the return of Jesus Christ when He will stand with His feet on the Olive Mountain just outside Jerusalem as prophesied. If you mess with Israel, you are trying to mess with God. |
2026-07-25 23:55:33 +02:00 | Laura | No I do not | Constitutional issues | People should be respected for their beliefs and should be allowed to stand for their beliefs. |
2026-07-25 22:48:10 +02:00 | Tureza Katriena | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-07-25 19:32:17 +02:00 | Ulenka | No I do not | Other | It does not support my chritia belief |
2026-07-25 17:52:36 +02:00 | Sudasha | No I do not | Weaponising laws | This bill is an attack and goes against our constitutional rights; free speech, and freedom of religion. South Africa is a country of majority Christians. It is the Christians who will be oppressed, and this will be used against them. I will not denounce Jesus Christ, my Saviour. The Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel. |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.