Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-05-25 13:37:24 +02:00 | Jenny | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-05-25 01:10:59 +02:00 | Maxine | No I do not | Constitutional issues | This Country was founded on Christian faith and we must be free to choose which religion we belong to. This should not be decided by a Muslim or a Party whose religious views differ from ours. |
2026-05-24 20:32:21 +02:00 | Sheila | No I do not | Other | |
2026-05-24 20:32:21 +02:00 | Sheila | No I do not | Other | |
2026-05-24 20:05:57 +02:00 | Dot | No I do not | Weaponising laws |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.