Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | concern | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-08-10 09:12:10 +02:00 | Hilda | Not fully | All of the above | Focus on Physical Buildings vs Direct Teacher Support | |
2026-08-10 09:09:02 +02:00 | Gwababa | Yes I do | Administrative Delays (3-Month HoD Approval Window) | ||
2026-08-10 09:02:41 +02:00 | Neliswa | No I do not | All of the above | General Support for Standardisation & Financial Oversight | E-voting could disenfranchise parents without data or smartphones, and that setting building norms does not address educator workload inside crowded classrooms. |
2026-08-10 08:17:10 +02:00 | George | No I do not | All of the above | HoD Powers to Dissolve Underperforming SGBs | State is failing in the education process. Classes are to big. State governance is up hauling. |
2026-08-10 07:31:20 +02:00 | Joyce | No I do not | All of the above | Focus on Physical Buildings vs Direct Teacher Support | The department of education should should prioritise school safety for learners and Teachers. Building mist be safe and insect every year for building defaults. The appointment must be on merit and not because someone is the friend of the principal and sgb. , that teacher must be evaluate by dept officials. A survey must be done with teachers before any policy is implemented. The minister must be an educator for 10 years and more , and go through the ranks before being considered. |
-
- What Supporters Say
Closes corruption loopholes & stops double-dipping: Prevents wealthy schools from privately inflating state salaries, ensures tax compliance, and protects public funds from unauthorised bonuses. - What Opponents Say
Creates administrative paralysis: A 3-month HoD waiting period for sports or extra math classes stifles extracurriculars and penalizes dedicated teachers who go above and beyond.
- What Supporters Say