Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-03-18 06:35:50 +02:00 | Richard | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-03-17 14:19:44 +02:00 | Shaun | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-03-17 09:39:15 +02:00 | Tom | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-03-17 02:30:14 +02:00 | Siphiwe | No I do not | Other | |
2026-03-16 16:48:23 +02:00 | Frans | No I do not | Constitutional issues | I have the right to decide who i associate with, yes it must not threaten the Republic of South Africa and security here. |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.