Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-12-05 09:27:33 +02:00 | James | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2025-12-05 09:27:15 +02:00 | Mpho | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2025-12-05 09:27:09 +02:00 | Simon | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2025-12-05 09:26:39 +02:00 | Richard | No I do not | Constitutional issues | New World Order tactics. Total evil and anti-Christian. |
2025-12-05 09:26:26 +02:00 | Nerine | Yes I do | Constitutional issues | We need to hold criminals like the Israeli government accountable for gross human rights violations. |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.