Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-05-03 18:44:00 +02:00 | Carlos | No I do not | Weaponising laws | This Al- Jamal party has less than 1 ,% of national votes. Why are we even voting for this stupid Islamic law |
2026-04-28 12:13:34 +02:00 | Valerie | No I do not | Weaponising laws | Stop the advancement of oppressive laws which only favour certain groups and focus on rebuilding the country. Whilst people are starving you are trying to promote covert things. |
2026-04-25 14:04:09 +02:00 | Roy | No I do not | Political motivation | A total waste of tax money debating such a nonsensical 'apartheid' issue. Who are we to judge what is an 'apartheid' practice, when one could equally argue that the supporters of Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS, and other organizations are also motivated by the particular elimination of Jews and Christians!? A very weak strategy of these political parties to increase their voter support base. I totally reject such proposals that do not contribute to building one, united South African nation. |
2026-04-25 09:16:39 +02:00 | Smita | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-04-20 14:48:17 +02:00 | Sandra | No I do not | Political motivation | This is a political move against our Constitutional Freedom 0f Association. |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.