Unlockdown support

Thank you for choosing to support DearSA’s #unlockdown legal challenge.

Dear South Africa

5846 supporters so far. Add your name below.

    Do you support DearSA's #unlockdown legal challenge?

    Check your email address then hit send! You will be redirected to a confirmation page.


    Yes I do
    Yes I do
    We understand the dangers of Covid and know how to take care of ourselves, do not need to be treated like children.
    Lockdown is causing untold harm to business and the Economy.
    Yes I do
    Is it to be understood that the powers in Government know more and are more qualified than the National and International Professors, Scientists, Doctors and highly qualified persons working feverishly to eradicate this pandemic. Is there possibly a hidden agenda somewhere????
    Stop this lock down immediately
    Yes I do
    No I do not
    Tired of being told what to do wand when allowed to do it by incapable politicians
    Yes I do
    Banning of tobacco products and liquor is beyond ridiculous! This forces more people roaming the streets in search thereof and thereby running the risk of either getting the virus or spreading it. Now we are forced to support the blackmarket (making us criminals?) and the government is losing thousands (if not millions) in tax.
    Instead of paying R25,00 per packet (legally) it's costing us from as little as R70,00 per packet even going up to R120,00 per packet, and no tax is being paid on this. Using the excuse that people share cigarettes, is 30% true, but then she doesn't consider the fact that they share cooldrinks as well. How can NDZ decide on our behalf whether we can smoke etc or not! We are the only country in the world with this ridiculous ban. We are not kids. Please do something about this!!!!

    Yes I do
    Yes I do
    Yes I do
    Yes I do
    While I support this action, I believe it does not go far enough. With although the data that has become available, I believe that the Government should move immediately to level 2 restrictions.
    The economy and thus jobs have to be saved.
    Yes I do
    Yes I do
    It is reasonable to suggest some limit on the number of attendees at an event, or to keep a distance between individuals. This should not mean a total loss of freedom to move about and restrictions on which products one may purchase or consume.
    These rules should be tested in a court of law in terms of the constitutional rights of the people and what is reasonable.
    Yes I do
    Jakobus P H
    Yes I do
    This government should be exposed for what they are namely a kakistocracy, kleptocracy and actually an atrocity. They are using this pandemic to expand central control as it is their declared policy to rule absolutely and the glaring failed example being USSR and the ongoing is North Korea, China and Venezuela plus some other authoritarian regimes on this planet. The ANC is not to be trusted in any action especially if it is done for your good without input from knowledgeable people and transparency as is now the case.
    Yes I do

    Media release – for immediate distribution

    Issued by Dear SA, 8 May 2020

    Dear SA challenges government over e-commerce ban and 3-hour exercise limit

    Attorneys for civil rights group DearSA today delivered a letter of demand to the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, challenging the government’s ban on e-commerce and its limitation on outside exercise to three hours a day.

    The organisation has requested the government amend the Covid-19 lockdown regulations to allow for all forms of online retailing on the grounds that this would support rather than impede the campaign to stop the spread of the virus.

    It also wants government to allow South Africans to engage in any form of non-group outdoor exercise during daylight hours, as opposed to the current daily allowance between the hours of 6h00 and 9h00.

    Attorney for Dear SA, Daniel Eloff of Hurter Spies Inc, has also notified the minister that unless a response is received by the close of business on 14 May 2020, Dear SA will be compelled to seek urgent relief in court.

    “Our client, however, trusts that unnecessary litigation could be avoided and look forward to your urgent response,” concludes Eloff’s letter to the minister.

    The letter raises concerns that government decisions over the lockdown are ad hoc rather than data-driven, which has resulted in a potential massive economic overkill.

    Cost of protracted lockdown to human life worse than the disease

    The letter to the minister cites data from Pandemic Data and Analytics (PANDA) showing the years of life lost to South Africans as a result of the lockdown could be 29 times more costly to life than the disease itself.

    PANDA estimates that nearly 14 million years of life could be lost to the population of SA as a result of the lockdown.

    Massive overkill

    Various economic studies, some of them by government itself, show that a prolonged lockdown will have a devastating impact on the economy, with the construction sector likely to suffer a 30% decline in employment. A study by SA-TIED suggests the financial and manufacturing sectors are likely to experience a 15% decline in employment if the lockdown is prolonged.

    The effect of the lockdown will be a massive decline in the demand and supply of many industries, with particularly severe effects in the service sectors, such as restaurants, entertainment, tourism, travel and hotels, according to SA-TIED.

    In a presentation to the Standing Committee on Finance, National Treasury recently warned that it was projecting between 3 and 7 million job losses as a result of a protracted lockdown to fight the spread of Covid-19.

    Further data from the Actuarial Society of SA shows that the risks of Covid-19 are highly correlated with age, with more than half the cases requiring hospitalisation in SA occurring in the 70+ age group. Fewer than 5% of all cases requiring hospitalisation are aged below 40.

    Lockdown measures cannot stop the virus from spreading, but they can slow down the speed of infections. Lockdowns will not save the lives of those who contract Covid-19 and do not require hospitalisation. They also do not save the lives of those who contract the virus and would sadly and regrettably succumb to the disease even if they gained access to an ICU bed. They only assist those who contract the virus and would survive if they were hospitalised but are unable to receive such care because the health system has been overrun.

    Opening e-commerce would reduce contact between infected persons

    Dear SA also points to a study showing that the key benefit of e-commerce is that it substantially reduces contact that would be experienced in physical stores. To therefore ban e-commerce on the grounds that this is unfair to bricks and mortar stores is irrational if the purpose is to stop the spread of the disease. Bricks and mortar stores are far more likely to accelerate their online offerings if allowed to do so.

    The letter also cites studies from China showing that pandemic outbreaks are much less likely to spread outdoors than indoors. “This means people should be given more freedom to exercise outdoors during daylight hours,” says Dear SA. Limiting the exercise window to three hours a day creates congestion and raises the risk of transmission.

    Dear SA says it is calling for a reasonable approach to regulations aimed at addressing the public health issue.

    Contact Daniël Eloff of Hurter Spies Inc.


    082 838 5290