Review of Burdens imposed on Local Government by Legislation

2 active citizens had a say

ALRC: Review of Regulatory, Compliance and Reporting Burdens imposed on Local Government by Legislation

The South African Law Reform Commission (SALRC) is reviewing the regulatory, compliance and reporting obligations imposed on local government through legislation and is inviting you to comment on its discussion paper. Submissions must be made by no later than Wednesday, 31 July 2019.

The Commission is calling on interested parties to make submissions about:

-onerous regulatory, compliance and reporting obligations ;

-how, in practice, these obligations affect municipalities;

-any proposals on how to streamline o remove these obligations; and

-what impact, if any, streamlining or removing these obligations would have for municipalities, other organs of state and communities.

Important to note; this is not a petition but is a legally protected policy-shaping process mandated under the SA Constitution. Your comment is immediately sent as a unique email to the designated government representative and must, by law, be acknowledged and considered. Had this been a petition, all comments would be seen as a single collective submission.

By using DearSA’s service you ensure an accurate record is held by civil society (on DearSA’s encrypted database) so government cannot dispute participation facts or figures. This process forms a solid foundation for a legal case should the necessity arise.

Shape this policy now

Do you agree with the Review of Regulatory, Compliance and Reporting Burdens imposed on Local Government by Legislation? (see summary)
Yes I doNo I do notNot fully

Check your email address is correct then hit send!

A copy of your message will be sent to you along with an automated proof of receipt. Check your junk mail folder if you can’t find it.


Displaying newest 5 comments sent.

Not fully
I believe that the various legislative requirements had been put in place for 2 reasons:
1) To make it easier at provincial level to report to the national level on issues regarding the local government (which is an unnecessary burden on the local government); and
2) To have the necessary checks and balances in place in order to find and address theft, fraud, mismanagement, and corruption.

In regard to point 1, the problem might be cleared up by having standardized forms and procedures. There are a handful of municipalities that consistently come through with clean audits. They are clearly doing something right. Use them as models for other municipalities.

In regard to point 2, it must be noted that it does not matter how many checks and balances you have if you don't take action against the people responsible for mismanagement, theft, fraud, or corruption. What happens is that the Auditor General audits a municipality and provides them with a report and tells them how they can go about correcting their faults. The municipalities rarely follow through with any corrective measures. If your CFO has been found to be mismanaging funds, disciplinary action need to be taken against him/her. Limpopo has a huge problem with regard to corruption, mismanagement and nepotism - you can't fix that by taking away a legislative framework designed to catch such deeds. You need to put effective measures in place to identify problems, address those problems effectively, and ensure accountability of the persons responsible.

In closing, I don't think that this proposed review focuses on the root of the major problems that local government experiences. It is only a small portion of it and won't have the desired results - if the result that you are looking for is better run local government.
No I do not
It would like governent to elaborate more on what constitutes a legislative burden.