comments2

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying the 15 latest comments.

Submitted
first-name
support
concern
top-concern
message
2026-08-24 15:43:41 +02:00
Fred
No I do not
All of the above
Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals
This is surely a Heritage Site. Protect it.

The CoCT and Western Cape Government needs to develop functional regional transportation systems to service outlying areas and reduce the necessity of providing ad hoc developments for human settlements closer to the city centre. The relative small size of the development will not make any dent in the provision of housing in the CoCT.
2026-08-24 14:02:48 +02:00
Shaun
No I do not
Severe Sewer & Utility Grid Strains
2026-08-24 13:36:16 +02:00
Anthony
No I do not
All of the above
The Information Blackout
2026-08-22 06:29:06 +02:00
Rob
No I do not
All of the above
Fabricated Transport Infrastructure
2026-08-21 05:48:00 +02:00
Reinhardt
No I do not
All of the above
Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals
2026-08-20 18:36:51 +02:00
Theo
No I do not
All of the above
Procedural Unfairness & Retroactive Approvals
2026-08-20 13:08:41 +02:00
David
No I do not
All of the above
Loss of Public Asset
If anything, the members of King David Mowbray Golf Club should be given the option of purchasing the land. There is land in District Six which has been sitting vacant for decades, this should be developed first before golf courses and other recreational areas are destroyed.
2026-08-20 11:59:40 +02:00
Ita
No I do not
Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals
2026-08-19 22:32:52 +02:00
Deborah
No I do not
All of the above
Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals
2026-08-19 21:43:01 +02:00
Theo
Not fully
All of the above
The Information Blackout
I believe it would be better to adapt the current golf course to a 9 hole course with shared greens playing 18 as it is at The Metropolitan course.
The course needs to be next to the N2 and then the development beyond so that will eliminate the hazard of the , " flying objects " and remain an asset.
MEET HALF WAY.
2026-08-19 07:32:22 +02:00
Robin
No I do not
All of the above
Loss of Public Asset
Government needs to lead by example and utilize their privately owned property first. Rezoning for political voting is underhanded
2026-08-18 19:48:58 +02:00
Riana
No I do not
All of the above
Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals
2026-08-18 16:23:26 +02:00
Annie
No I do not
Severe Sewer & Utility Grid Strains
2026-08-18 16:05:41 +02:00
Geoff
No I do not
All of the above
Severe Sewer & Utility Grid Strains
2026-08-18 09:31:01 +02:00
Chris
No I do not
All of the above
Loss of Public Asset

The City maintains that the redevelopment process is entirely “procedurally sound” following the adoption of Council Resolution C39/05/26 on 27 May 2026. Proponents argue that the draft concept represents a vital step toward spatial justice, turning an exclusive recreational area into a vibrant, high-density precinct with 8,600 homes (minimum 30% social housing). They assert that technical studies, transit coordination, and environmental impact assessments will be dealt with thoroughly in the subsequent legislative phases after the land disposal principle is approved.

Opponents argue that the City is executing an administrative “bait-and-switch.” Asking the public to approve an irreversible public asset disposal while keeping essential technical studies (valuations, sewer metrics, and TIAs) hidden behind PAIA walls violates the basic tenets of fair administrative action under PAJA. Furthermore, the revelation that PRASA has zero alignment with the City’s transit claims proves that the project’s planning is prematurely optimised. The community insists that the public participation process must be halted and restarted only when all baseline evidence is public and the legal authorisations are genuinely transparent.