comments

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying the 5 latest comments.

Submitted
first-name
support
concern
top-concern
message
2026-07-02 15:03:57 +02:00
Susanna
No I do not
All of the above
Economic Impact
2026-06-30 21:56:22 +02:00
Cornelia
No I do not
Regulatory Overreach
This suggestion is unacceptable. Hosts and guests already take a significant risk in proceeding with such short- term rental agreements- and should benefit from it themselves, not feed the state's coffers. This will have a negative impact on tourism, and the economy at large.
2026-06-29 15:09:55 +02:00
Amelda
No I do not
All of the above
Economic Impact
2026-06-25 10:58:22 +02:00
Audrey
Not fully
Regulatory Overreach
I understand a model that would increase the availability of long-term lease housing in cities where blocks of flats are bought as 'hotels' for STR.
I don't support the over-regulation of genuine 'Airbnb' STR.
2026-06-24 16:34:28 +02:00
Francoise
No I do not
All of the above
Economic Impact
      • Fair Competition: It levels the playing field between Airbnbs and traditional hotels/B&Bs that pay commercial rates and tourism levies
      • Housing Availability: Regulating STRs prevents long-term rental stock from being depleted, making housing more affordable for locals.
      • Safety & Quality: It ensures a minimum standard of safety (smoke detectors, insurance) for international and local tourists. Guests deserve the same safety and insurance protections in an Airbnb as they get in a 5-star hotel.
      • Community Harmony: It gives residents and Body Corporates a framework to manage noise, parking, and security issues caused by transient guests.
      • Privacy: Forcing guests to submit to government-tracked data sharing is a violation of privacy that will drive tourists to other destinations.
      • Livelihood Threat: Many South Africans rely on STR income to pay their mortgages and survive the cost-of-living crisis; over-regulation kills this “side-hustle”.
      • Property Rights: A homeowner should have the right to use their private property as they see fit without government-mandated caps on occupancy.
      • Administrative Overkill: The requirements are too “corporate” for a simple room-sharing arrangement and will discourage new entrants.
      • Privacy Risk: Forcing platforms to share personal data with the state is an overreach that risks the security of both hosts and guests.