winelands

DearSA-winelands-budget-2022-3
DEAR-SOUTH-AfFRICA

Cape Winelands District Municipality (Breede Valley, Drakenstein, Langeberg, Stellenbosch Witzenberg) calls for public comment on proposed tariff increases, the draft budget and IDP

    • Proposed increases are available in the summary below

Scroll down to have your say

Have your say – shape the outcome.

    Do you agree with the proposed tariff/rates increases? (scroll down to view)

    what is your concern?

    As you've selected 'All of the above', if you had to choose a top concern, what would it be?

    What is your preferred channel for feedback on this campaign?

    Your preferred language?

    What is your status? (for our reporting purposes only)



    Check your email address then hit send! You will be redirected to a confirmation page.

    D-icon

    THE INCREASES ARE AS FOLLOWS

    Staff salaries 4.75%

    Property Rates Electricity Water Refuse / San
    Drakenstein (Paarl) -3.7% (Decrease) 6.3% 7.7% 4.5%
    Langeberg (Robertson) 3.7% 9.01% 3.7% 8.0%
    Stellenbosch ~3.7% 9.01% ~4.5% ~4.5%
    Breede Valley (Worcester) ~4.5% 9.01% ~4.5% ~4.5%
    Witzenberg (Ceres) ~4.5% 10.9% ~4.5% ~4.5%
    Staff Salaries 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75%
      • The Drakenstein Rates Decrease: Drakenstein is a major success story as they are proposing a 3.7% decrease in property rates to offset the impact of high utility costs. This is in stark contrast to municipalities like Mangaung (which is eyeing a revenue hike of 33%).
      • The 6.3% Electricity absorption: Drakenstein is also absorbing part of the Eskom bulk hike, passing on only 6.3% to consumers instead of the 9.01% standard.
      • Langeberg’s Refuse Outlier: While Langeberg is disciplined on rates (3.7%), their 8% refuse hike is nearly double the salary benchmark. This is a local pain point for Robertson and Montagu residents.
      • The Salary Anchor: As with the rest of the country, all five locals are bound by the 4.75% staff salary increase. Any service hike significantly above this (like Witzenberg’s electricity or Drakenstein’s water) suggests the municipality is using that service as a “cash cow” to fund other parts of the budget.

    Have we got the wrong information?