Amajuba District (Dannhauser, eMadlangeni, Newcastle) calls for public comment on proposed tariff increases, the draft budget and IDP
-
- Proposed increases are available in the summary below
Scroll down to have your say
Have your say – shape the outcome.
The Amajuba District 🌄 in KwaZulu-Natal presents an interesting case of “middle-ground” budgeting for 2026/2027. While some metros are pushing for massive double-digit hikes, the councils here are largely attempting to stay within the 4.5% – 4.7% inflation corridor for most services, with electricity ⚡ being the primary outlier.
THE INCREASES ARE AS FOLLOWS
Staff salaries 4.75%
| Electricity ⚡ | Property Rates 🏠 | Water & San 💧 | Refuse 🗑️ | |
| Newcastle | 9.01% | 4.6% | 5.22% | 4.6% |
| eMadlangeni (Utrecht) | 9.01% | 4.6% | 5.22% | 4.6% |
| Dannhauser | 10.92% | 4.4% | 5.22% | 4.4% |
| Staff Salaries | 4.75% | 4.75% | 4.75% | 4.75% |
-
- The Newcastle “Compromise”: The Newcastle Council recently rejected a 19.8% cost-of-recovery electricity proposal in favor of a lower 9.01% hike. 🛡️ This proves that public pressure and council oversight can force a municipality to prioritise affordability over revenue.
- Amajuba District’s Water Role: Since the District Municipality (ADM) controls the water, residents in Newcastle or Dannhauser need to know that their “water anger” should be directed at the District Council, not their local mayor. The 5.22% increase is slightly above the 4.75% salary benchmark, which is the “efficiency gap” you can challenge. 🌊
- Dannhauser’s Electricity Markup: At 10.92%, Dannhauser is charging its residents roughly 2% more than the bulk increase it pays to Eskom. This “surplus” is often used to fund other municipal operations, which is a key point for public objection. 🔌
- The Valuation Buffer: Most of these locals are keeping rates at 4.4% – 4.6%. However, if there was a recent property valuation roll, the actual bill increase could be much higher.
Have we got the wrong information?