Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 30 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-02 20:01:59 +02:00 | Alta | No I do not | Political motivation | I will always support Israel because Num.6.27 And they shall put My Name upon the Israelites, and I will bless them. The Name of God Almighty is on Israel and Imraan Ismail-Moosa's Name is not. If he wants to contest with God Almighty YAHWEH, he is welcome. Doom is written all over him and his family and his descendants forever. |
2026-01-02 19:59:35 +02:00 | Fanie | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 19:55:32 +02:00 | Mark | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 19:47:01 +02:00 | Warren | No I do not | Weaponising laws | We are a Christian country, what Israel is doing in Israel has nothing to do with South Africa, they are not and Apardheid state, I do not accept the Islamic terrorist narrative that a minority of people is pushing |
2026-01-02 19:42:33 +02:00 | Marisa | No I do not | Political motivation | Absolute rubbish! Israel is not an apartheid state. |
2026-01-02 19:08:06 +02:00 | F | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 18:56:03 +02:00 | Bonita | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 18:48:56 +02:00 | Lolo | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:47:34 +02:00 | Lee | No I do not | Other | |
2026-01-02 18:37:42 +02:00 | Nigel | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-01-02 18:36:58 +02:00 | Nic | No I do not | Political motivation | The proposed law constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources. |
2026-01-02 18:34:01 +02:00 | Rae | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-01-02 18:31:38 +02:00 | SP | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 18:31:38 +02:00 | SP | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 18:27:53 +02:00 | barbarba | No I do not | Weaponising laws | This is a free country, with freedom of private opinion and thought. Plenty of countries and regimes we wish others wouldn't support but its personal freedom of choice |
2026-01-02 18:27:40 +02:00 | JP | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-01-02 18:26:54 +02:00 | Andre | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:23:45 +02:00 | HW | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:21:58 +02:00 | Sara-Marí | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 18:20:57 +02:00 | Yvette | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:19:02 +02:00 | Alastair | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 18:18:04 +02:00 | Sue | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-01-02 18:13:01 +02:00 | Viv | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:12:59 +02:00 | Viv | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:08:04 +02:00 | Jan | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-01-02 18:05:03 +02:00 | Joseph | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 18:02:25 +02:00 | Stella | No I do not | Other | |
2026-01-02 17:57:05 +02:00 | Gail | No I do not | Political motivation | |
2026-01-02 17:53:15 +02:00 | Fred | No I do not | Weaponising laws | |
2026-01-02 17:48:39 +02:00 | Michael | No I do not | Political motivation | Apart from he obvious difficulty in specifying how "support" will be defined in a narrow and specific enough way to provide absolute distinction as to the breach of law for persecution purposes, the introduction of a law specifically to address sovereign state internal affairs would seem to fall outside the bounds of the requirements of our constitution. To pass judgment on the segregation legality of a foreign state while the current legislation embodying segregation in the current labour laws in this country should rather be addressed and removed from this countries statutes before concerning our country in attempting to weaponize our legislation for narrow political gain and remove focus from internal segregation which has proved to enable a small section of the population at the expense of the greater economy. |