Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | concern | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-07-15 16:01:12 +02:00 | Lee | No I do not | Regulatory Overreach | My contract and agreement with my guest is between me and my guest, Tsek ANC | |
2026-07-12 23:07:17 +02:00 | Pieter | No I do not | All of the above | Economic Impact | |
2026-07-08 23:18:53 +02:00 | G | No I do not | All of the above | Regulatory Overreach | South Africans already pay enough taxes leave build something successful of your own and stop destroying your citizens |
2026-07-02 15:03:57 +02:00 | Susanna | No I do not | All of the above | Economic Impact | |
2026-06-30 21:56:22 +02:00 | Cornelia | No I do not | Regulatory Overreach | This suggestion is unacceptable. Hosts and guests already take a significant risk in proceeding with such short- term rental agreements- and should benefit from it themselves, not feed the state's coffers. This will have a negative impact on tourism, and the economy at large. |
-
-
- Fair Competition: It levels the playing field between Airbnbs and traditional hotels/B&Bs that pay commercial rates and tourism levies
- Housing Availability: Regulating STRs prevents long-term rental stock from being depleted, making housing more affordable for locals.
- Safety & Quality: It ensures a minimum standard of safety (smoke detectors, insurance) for international and local tourists. Guests deserve the same safety and insurance protections in an Airbnb as they get in a 5-star hotel.
- Community Harmony: It gives residents and Body Corporates a framework to manage noise, parking, and security issues caused by transient guests.
-
-
-
- Privacy: Forcing guests to submit to government-tracked data sharing is a violation of privacy that will drive tourists to other destinations.
- Livelihood Threat: Many South Africans rely on STR income to pay their mortgages and survive the cost-of-living crisis; over-regulation kills this “side-hustle”.
- Property Rights: A homeowner should have the right to use their private property as they see fit without government-mandated caps on occupancy.
- Administrative Overkill: The requirements are too “corporate” for a simple room-sharing arrangement and will discourage new entrants.
- Privacy Risk: Forcing platforms to share personal data with the state is an overreach that risks the security of both hosts and guests.
-