Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying 30 random comments. Click here to see more.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message | template |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-07-09 11:06:54 +02:00 | Natalie | No I do not | Constitutionality of the Bill | Yes I do | |
2026-06-03 09:02:57 +02:00 | Thomas | No I do not | All of the above | No I do not | |
2026-05-27 11:57:37 +02:00 | Giulio | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-05-21 14:46:07 +02:00 | daniel | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | No I do not | |
2026-05-19 08:54:58 +02:00 | Don | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-05-07 13:30:17 +02:00 | Lee | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-04-17 21:24:52 +02:00 | Gail | No I do not | Constitutionality of the Bill | Yes I do | |
2026-04-14 11:16:15 +02:00 | Lesley | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-04-14 11:13:39 +02:00 | Nadine | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-04-13 22:27:46 +02:00 | Karen | No I do not | Other | No I do not | |
2026-03-31 16:30:06 +02:00 | Karl | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-03-19 20:26:13 +02:00 | Lori | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | Yes I do | |
2026-03-19 11:10:40 +02:00 | Lilith | No I do not | Other | This is an irrational bill. | No I do not |
2026-03-18 08:28:29 +02:00 | Eberhardt | No I do not | The Bill is vague and ambiguous | No I do not | |
2026-03-18 07:22:18 +02:00 | Paul | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | The President and his cronies are busy implementing laws thst they themselves to abide by. He, himself introduced Zondo Commission and he cronies got away with the crime and now is Madlanga. He needs to focus on serious issues and introducing laws after laws that he and his cronies dont abide by. | No I do not |
2026-03-18 04:57:44 +02:00 | Pierre | No I do not | The broad definition of hate speech | Yes I do | |
2026-03-17 14:03:14 +02:00 | Shaun | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | No I do not | |
2026-03-17 09:19:03 +02:00 | Braam | Yes I do | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-03-17 07:42:51 +02:00 | Kenneth | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-03-10 23:04:47 +02:00 | Adwin | No I do not | The Bill is unnecessary | Yes I do | |
2026-02-09 18:38:46 +02:00 | mpilo | No I do not | All of the above | I demand that the Act be narrowed to align strictly with Section 16 of the Constitution. Specifically, the vague concept of "emotional harm" must be replaced with the objective standard of "incitement of imminent violence." Furthermore, "occupation" must be removed as a protected category to prevent political censorship. This government is already perceived as being out of touch with reality; now, you seek a law that could prohibit citizens from criticizing the state and its decisions. You have developed a reputation for failing the people while protecting those with criminal associations. Now, you intend to punish citizens simply because you are personally offended by their words. Instead of fixing the police force, you are attempting to over-regulate law-abiding citizens. It is clearly easier for you to pass restrictive laws than it is to catch murderers or fix the economy. This law has nothing to do with protecting the people; it is designed to protect the government. If you cannot fulfill your basic duties to the public, you should step down. | No I do not |
2026-02-04 18:38:12 +02:00 | john | No I do not | All of the above | So called 'hate speech' is nothing more than CENSORSHIP. This Bill will be used to further shut down concerned citizens, PARTICULARLY the white variety. It will be used by butthurt people to cause major problems for other people, have them sent to jail for daring to stand up for themselves. The so-called 'president' is nothing more than a Soros puppet, and he needs to be stopped from signing this devastating piece of legislature. | No I do not |
2026-01-31 06:31:20 +02:00 | Malcolm | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-01-13 05:45:05 +02:00 | Linda | No I do not | All of the above | Do not trust the government and its proxy’s to fairly and without prejudice execute these powers based on your actions over the last 30 years. | Yes I do |
2026-01-11 22:29:58 +02:00 | Peter John | No I do not | All of the above | Yes I do | |
2026-01-08 21:17:19 +02:00 | Gerhard | No I do not | All of the above | Control freedom of speech | No I do not |
2025-12-28 22:43:52 +02:00 | Juan | No I do not | The Bill is vague and ambiguous | No. Please send the Bill back to Parliament under section 79(1) of the Constitution due to serious flaws. It is overbroad and vague, criminalising protected speech with penalties up to five years in jail—far harsher than civil remedies under existing laws. By not defining ‘hate’ clearly, it undermines the rule of law, making citizens unsure what constitutes a crime. It also fails the Rabat Plan of Action test, breaching our international commitments to limit criminal hate speech sanctions to strictly necessary cases. This risks abusing power against religious, political, or personal expression rather than genuinely combating prejudice. | Yes I do |
2025-12-12 12:45:42 +02:00 | Brian | No I do not | The broad definition of hate speech | Yes I do | |
2025-12-11 12:17:32 +02:00 | Matt | No I do not | The broad definition of hate speech | No I do not | |
2025-12-10 19:50:14 +02:00 | Ronell | No I do not | All of the above | No I do not |