Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying 30 random comments. Click here to see more.
Submitted | first-name | discussion | support-WHO | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023-11-30 22:43:50 +02:00 | Velden | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of independence in decisions on Health, pandemics and regulations in SA | South Africa must reject WHO's international pandemic agreement in order to safeguard its national interests and protect its citizens. While global cooperation is essential in addressing pandemics, blindly adhering to a one-size-fits-all approach proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) may not be in the best interest of the country. South Africa has unique socio-economic and healthcare challenges that require tailored solutions rather than relying on a standard international agreement. Firstly, South Africa's healthcare system is already burdened by a high prevalence of communicable diseases, such as HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, coupled with significant resource constraints. By accepting the WHO's international pandemic agreement, the country may be forced to redirect its limited resources towards global priorities that may not necessarily align with its own urgent healthcare needs. Instead, South Africa should focus on strengthening its healthcare infrastructure, conducting valuable research, and implementing targeted interventions to combat existing and potential future pandemics effectively. Moreover, South Africa's socio-economic landscape vastly differs from that of developed nations. The WHO's international pandemic agreement might fail to consider the country's unique socio-economic challenges and the impact they have on the population's health. South Africa should prioritize developing strategies that address poverty, inequality, and limited access to healthcare, which are fundamental factors contributing to the vulnerability of its population during a pandemic. By rejecting the global agreement, the country can have the flexibility to develop its own tailored responses to effectively tackle public health crises while also addressing the underlying socio-economic determinants of health. In conclusion, South Africa must exercise its autonomy to reject the WHO's international pandemic agreement. By doing so, the country can prioritize its national interests, address its specific healthcare challenges, and safeguard the well-being of its citizens more effectively. A collaborative approach is essential, but it should be rooted in acknowledging and addressing unique local needs and circumstances rather than blindly adhering to a standardized international framework. |
2023-11-30 15:48:02 +02:00 | Debbie | No I do not | No I do not | Loss of independence in decisions on Health, pandemics and regulations in SA | |
2023-11-29 08:51:32 +02:00 | Marinda | Yes I do | No I do not | Other | The government has no right to make decisions on my behalf. |
2023-11-28 12:43:47 +02:00 | Christopher | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of independence in decisions on Health, pandemics and regulations in SA | This is unconstitutional and the n direct conflict with the Nuremberg protocols on the forced use of vaccinations . We will be controlled by political opportunists and not by medical necessity. |
2023-11-28 07:33:40 +02:00 | Allison | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | My concerns are actually all of the above listed. The WHO cannot be allowed to rule as a dictatorship over all of the UN nations. It cannot take away our autonomy and it cannot impose unconsented rules, restrictions, and actions on us. How can you even think to allow this when the very section pertaining to maintaining human rights and dignity has been removed from the proposal. They’re quite literally stating that they will act against our wishes as civilians even if we don’t want it, even if it is an infringement on our basic human rights, even if it is against our will. I say hell no. Keep your dreams of ruling the world to your imagination and storybooks. Not in my lifetime. Not in any lifetime. Keep WHO out. |
2023-11-27 16:08:31 +02:00 | Daniel | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | |
2023-11-25 09:02:44 +02:00 | Jackie | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of Constitutional rights and Democratic process | |
2023-11-24 22:55:51 +02:00 | Abednigo | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | WHO was not elected to decide for us therefore, it must not dictate us |
2023-11-24 19:38:17 +02:00 | Andrew | Yes I do | No I do not | Other | South Africa must remain a far as possible independent from the WHO and the UN. These institutions don't have the well being of anybody on this Globe at heart but only self enrichment and empowerment! All they are only interested in is implementation of draconian laws over peoples they have no jurisdiction over! These people are not elected officials of South Africa but are of THE ONE WORLD GOVERMENT CLAN! So NO! If this Government really wants to lose power and respect of South Africans go ahead and see the backlash. |
2023-11-24 17:30:37 +02:00 | Bernard | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | |
2023-11-24 12:12:55 +02:00 | Retief | No I do not | No I do not | Individual sovereignty | All the rights of the population regarding consent and what we consent to will be nullified by this superior authority that will be given the the WHO if SA accept this. This will create more problems if a hand full of people decide what is best for all the people on the planet, we know what happened to some of our loved ones with the Covid vaccine as a blanket approach was followed and now we wonder was it worth their lives? |
2023-11-24 06:17:33 +02:00 | Shaun | Yes I do | Not fully | Financial contributions to the WHO using your taxes | |
2023-11-23 16:43:06 +02:00 | Sarah | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | |
2023-11-23 11:42:15 +02:00 | Peter | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of independence in decisions on Health, pandemics and regulations in SA | |
2023-11-23 10:10:14 +02:00 | TERSIA | Yes I do | No I do not | Individual sovereignty | |
2023-11-23 09:17:16 +02:00 | Itumeleng | Not fully | No I do not | Loss of Constitutional rights and Democratic process | Try and send the document to health practitioners and all affected citizens, workshop people, drill it down to the communities that do not have access to internet and smart gadgets. Then we will be able to make an informed decisions on things that affect our taxes and other things. |
2023-11-23 07:33:52 +02:00 | HelloI | Yes I do | Yes I do | Loss of Constitutional rights and Democratic process | |
2023-11-23 06:20:41 +02:00 | Quentin | Yes I do | No I do not | Financial contributions to the WHO using your taxes | |
2023-11-23 04:26:47 +02:00 | Dries | Yes I do | No I do not | Individual sovereignty | This is evil control |
2023-11-22 19:26:37 +02:00 | John | Yes I do | No I do not | Individual sovereignty | The WHO should not have any power over us! |
2023-11-22 16:40:48 +02:00 | Molly | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of Constitutional rights and Democratic process | |
2023-11-22 10:53:59 +02:00 | Willem | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | WHO has proven over the last couple of years that their concern is not to protect people from health issues, but to enslave people and to over right so called elected representatives. |
2023-11-22 10:51:57 +02:00 | Marianne | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of independence in decisions on Health, pandemics and regulations in SA | |
2023-11-22 08:37:05 +02:00 | Merissa | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of Constitutional rights and Democratic process | |
2023-11-22 06:57:35 +02:00 | Bruce | Yes I do | No I do not | WHO influence on SA government | We should leave the WHO. They hav an anti human agenda and do not serve our interests |
2023-11-21 23:34:50 +02:00 | Yolande | No I do not | No I do not | Loss of independence in decisions on Health, pandemics and regulations in SA | We must retain national sovereignty and individual integrity and independence |
2023-11-21 19:59:17 +02:00 | Ania | Yes I do | No I do not | Loss of Constitutional rights and Democratic process | We know that the WHO have an agenda that is sinister in its essense. The whole recent plandemic and shutting the globe down so unnecessarily is part of their agenda to move towards a one world order, where there would be no sovereignty afforded to any country or individual. Where there control would, God forbid, be global. We can not allow this, especially in the light of increasing numbers waking up to their plans. SA govt have fallen for the agenda and need a wake up to the dangers they have already exposed us to, the forcing of the jabs, and now the many vaccine injuries. Its all so evil in its intent. We cannot allow this . |
2023-11-21 19:16:24 +02:00 | Gerald | Yes I do | No I do not | Financial contributions to the WHO using your taxes | We need to fix our countries medical facilities not to waste tax payers good money on WHO. They will not help you or I to pay our hospital or doctors bills. |
2023-11-21 17:48:22 +02:00 | Jacques | Yes I do | No I do not | Individual sovereignty | |
2023-11-21 16:56:53 +02:00 | Grenville | Yes I do | No I do not | Individual sovereignty | A country should have the right to implement the policies of WHO as a guideline, not be forced to impose their policies on it's citizens. The citizens vote for the government, they don't vote for WHO. Through the Covid pandemic WHO have been shown to be a corrupt organisation, why would any country allow them that much influence? Where is the independence to be able to make the right decisions on behalf the citizens the government is meant to be serving? |