summary

Advert

Advert – scroll down

The Musina/Makhado Special Economic Zone comprises two geographical locations that address unique industrial clusters. The site in Musina targets the light industrial and agro-processing clusters, while the Makhado site is a metallurgical/mineral beneficiation complex. A third site has been identified to target the petrochemical industries.

The SEZ is strategically located along the N1 North-South route into the Southern African Development Community (SADC), very close to the border between South Africa and Zimbabwe. It forms part of the Trans-Limpopo Spatial Development Initiative (SDI) and has been developed as part of greater regional plans to unlock investment and economic growth and address the development of skills and employment. Newly built infrastructure enables full utilisation of the area’s unique combination of mineral endowments and supports industries in the full-value chains for mineral beneficiation, agro-processing and light industrial manufacturing.

The strategic location of the SEZ and its close proximity to the main land-based route into SADC and the African continent, together with supporting incentives and a good logistics backbone, will make it the location of choice for investment in the mineral beneficiation, agro-processing and petrochemical industries.

For more information visit the MMSEZ website

Dirty power generation

Metallurgy is energy-intensive. Indeed, steel is dubbed “congealed energy”. Given South Africa’s severe constraints, a dedicated 3,300MW coal-fired power plant (to be built by PowerChina) was originally planned to supply the zone’s electricity needs.

However, in the wake of China’s 2021 pledge not to build any new coal-fired power projects abroad, Fossil Free South Africa sought and received (somewhat oblique) confirmation from the Chinese Ambassador to South Africa that the MMSEZ power plant would not go ahead.

The MMSEZ SOC has since publicly announced that solar PV generation and renewables will replace the thermal electricity plant.

However, Environmental Authorisation was granted in February 2022 without any conditions attached, and makes express reference to the EIA Report, Scoping Report and revised site layout, which include the coal-fired power station. Moreover, the specialist report on the power supply plans, which forms part of the EIAr, states plainly that solar PV power generation is not viable and has been rejected as an option.

In July 2022 it was further announced that “green” coal-to-hydrogen fuel for electricity generation was now a part of the power supply plans mix.

Note: Ignoring the contribution of the power supply completely, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the coal-fueled zone will still be in region of 33.7MtCO2e with very serious consequences for South Africa.

building a mega-dam

Coal is not just dirty, it’s thirsty, especially coking coal.

The hitch is that where the coking plant for the smelter is to be located, there is no water.

Instead of changing the plan or changing the location, there is an unfeasible R13.8bn plan to meet the 125Mm3 required annually for the zone’s operation (80Mn3 of which is required by the metallurgical zone at the South Site) in the water-stressed region by:

    1. initially siphoning from groundwater sources, including from the Limpopo River’s alluvial aquifer, until-
    2. a planned mega-dam, the 1,000Mn3/a “Musina Dam” complex, is built close to the MMSEZ North Site, that will capture up to 60% of the Limpopo’s annual flow (according to the Pre-Feasibility Study conducted) to be stored “off-channel” at the Sand River mouth, from where it will be pumped uphill to the southern site over a distance of 50km, supplemented by-
    3.  a scheme known as the “Mutasshi Corridor” to pump 30Mm3/a from Zimbabwe’s Tokwe-Mukosi and Zhove dams.

See research report commissioned by the Friedrich Ebert Institute authored by Dr Victor Munnik.

The MM-SEZ is located in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, which has been inscribed by UNESCO in recognition of its outstanding biodiversity value.

Pollution from the noxious industrial zone and new coal mines that will supply it, will inevitably lead to severe severe and irreversible environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, damage to ecosystems and ecosystem services and destruction of natural capital.

Quite apart from CO2 emissions, coal mining and coal combustion have other highly negative environmental impacts: Sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury emissions, and the aftermath from sludge, slurry and fly ash ponds that contain a variety of toxins, combine to poison the air, soil and water across a vast area beyond the sites of the mines and factories.

Places that play host to extensive coal mining and related heavy industry are among the most polluted on earth.

The impact on water resources of the development of extensive coal mining as well as the industrial zones of the MMSEZ in this water-scarce region will be catastrophic.

The plan to supply the 125Mn m3/a water requirements of the SEZ from the Limpopo River and its tributaries, including the Mzingwane River in Zimbabwe, and from local groundwater sources, threatens the resiliency of the entire Limpopo River basin river system, and all other water users who depend on its water resources.

The loss and contamination of ground and surface water resources in Limpopo’s stressed catchments represents a threat to all other sectors, including farming, but it threatens the very survival of vulnerable rural households and small-scale farmers who depend on groundwater and run-of-river abstractions to meet their needs.

The Limpopo River basin is a transboundary water resource, and the threat this development indisputably poses to the basic human right to water access for downstream water users in Mozambique could translate into serious political risk as well.

The damage that the development of coal mining and coal-fueled heavy industry will inflict on other industries, especially on farming and tourism and the emerging biodiversity economy, as a consequence of pollution and the contamination of air, water and soil; the degradation of the wild character of the landscape and the loss of wildlife and wildlife habitat is near incalculable.

The development of the MMSEZ and and the coal mines essentially comes at the expense of all other sectors and will permanently destroy the carbon sink and biodiversity reservoir and their potential to create jobs, SMME opportunities, and livelihoods to benefit poor rural communities.

The Musina-Mahado Special Economic Zone is a large-scale industrial development that is the undergirding of an ambitious plan to industrialise the remote Vhembe region of South Africa’s northern Limpopo Province based on the exploitation of its coal resources.

Carte Blanche insert

SABC Developers of the Musina-Makhado Special Economic Zone (MMSEZ) in Limpopo plan to proceed with the removal of one thousand species of plants and trees on the land earmarked for industrialisation. Up to 3 500 hectares of land in the Vhembe District will be developed for industries as part of the envisioned Special Economic Zone (SEZ). Some environmental groups have raised concerns that this will result in thousands of protected species of trees, including the Baobab, being destroyed.

SABC The Musina-Makhado Special Economic Zone and the 10 new open-cast coal mines that will supply the industrial zone stand as a threat to a UNESCO-designated biodiversity sanctuary. According to the organisation Living Limpopo, the special economic zone has received licenses to destroy over 650 thousand protected trees, including 10 000 indigenous baobab trees. Vhembe Biosphere Reserve Development Director Lauren Liebenberg speaks to us on this matter.

SEZ Fact Sheet

Download [1.59 MB]

STATEMENTS AND MEDIA RELEASES

Click on a logo to view.

Want to display your organisation’s statement? Click here. 

Freedom of Religion SA (FOR SA)

TEMPLATE PROVIDED BY FOR SA

I strongly oppose the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Bill [B9B – 2018], which I believe to be unconstitutional and unnecessary, for the following reasons:

  1. The Bill violates our constitutional rights as religious persons to express our religious beliefs without fear of punishment or persecution (section 15, read with section 16). Increasingly, around the world but also in South Africa, various holy scriptures (particularly on contentious issues) are regarded as “politically incorrect” or “offensive”, allegedly causing emotional and/or social harm.
  2. I specifically oppose the Bill’s:
    1. wide definition of “harm” (in Clause 1);
    2. the failure to define “hatred” (in Clause 1); and
    3. definition of, and creation of, the crime of “hate speech” (in Clause 4).
  3. The creation of the crime of “hate speech” for saying / distributing something which could possibly be construed as “harmful”, will have certain unintended consequences, namely the criminalisation of good / well-meaning people who will be prosecuted for saying what they sincerely believe (according to their holy texts) and sent to jail.
  4. There are already sufficient existing laws dealing with “hate speech”.
  5. For all of the reasons given, I ask:
    1. For the scrapping of the “hate speech” sections from the Bill altogether;
    2. Alternatively, should the “hate speech” provisions remain part of the Bill, we ask:
      1. That “harm” be defined as: “gross emotional and psychological detriment that objectively and severely undermines the human dignity of the targeted group”; and
      2. That “hatred” be defined as: “strong and deeply-felt emotions of enmity, ill-will, detestation, malevolence and vilification against members of an identifiable group, that implies that members of that group are to be despised, scorned, denied respect and subjected to ill-treatment based on their group affiliation”.
    3. That Clause 4(2)(d) (the “religious exemption clause”) be strengthened as follows to protect:
      “expression of any religious conviction, tenet, belief, teaching, doctrine or writings, by a religious organisation or an individual, in public or in private, to the extent that such expression does not actively support, instigate, exhort, or call for extreme detestation, vilification, enmity, ill-will and malevolence that constitutes incitement to cause gross emotional and psychological harm that severely undermines the dignity of the targeted group, based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation”.