comments3

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying the 30 latest comments.

Submitted
first-name
support
concern
top-concern
message
2026-08-20 15:35:41 +02:00
Yolande
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-20 15:08:06 +02:00
Slawomir
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-20 10:23:46 +02:00
Douwe
No I do not
All of the above
Market Distortions via State Price-Stability Interventions
2026-08-20 09:11:50 +02:00
Heather
No I do not
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-20 08:47:13 +02:00
Gerald
No I do not
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-20 06:02:18 +02:00
Carel
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
Government must stop making more draconian laws to take a way our right to freedom. Start to replenish the fuel stockpile they stole, do away with laws like BEE that make it difficult to do business in SA. Free market and business will create the wealth SA needs.
2026-08-20 04:12:03 +02:00
Brian
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
Government must stop making more draconian laws, replenish the fuel stockpile they stole, as well as do away with laws like BEE that make it difficult to do business in SA. Free market and business will create the wealth SA needs.
2026-08-19 22:20:36 +02:00
Deborah
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-19 21:12:38 +02:00
Brian
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-19 20:13:11 +02:00
Tara
No I do not
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
Can we please just bring the price down already? Some people are struggling to make ends meet already and this just drags the morale straight to the mud
2026-08-19 17:55:00 +02:00
Jan
No I do not
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-19 16:22:12 +02:00
Amanda
No I do not
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-19 15:55:07 +02:00
Florence
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-19 14:57:41 +02:00
Tony
No I do not
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-19 14:54:52 +02:00
Johan
No I do not
All of the above
Market Distortions via State Price-Stability Interventions
2026-08-19 13:02:18 +02:00
Hendrik
Yes I do
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-19 12:28:46 +02:00
Lerene
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
Placing the sole custody of 60 days of state strategic fuel into the hands of the newly formed South African National Petroleum Company (SANPC)—a merger of historically troubled state entities like PetroSA and the Strategic Fuel Fund—raises immediate red flags. Critics fear corruption, structural inefficiency, and procurement irregularities could compromise the actual physical availability of the reserves when a crisis hits.
2026-08-19 10:50:39 +02:00
Babongile
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-19 10:30:10 +02:00
Trevor
No I do not
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-19 09:38:49 +02:00
Clyde
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-19 08:31:36 +02:00
Lukhwa
No I do not
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-19 07:18:35 +02:00
Robin
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
Government will not prevent overreach and will utilize the mechanism as another means of pillage.
2026-08-19 04:16:34 +02:00
Saziso
Yes I do
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
2026-08-19 01:14:59 +02:00
Jim
No I do not
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
I am writing to state my complete and total opposition to the proposed Draft Strategic Petroleum Stock Policy, 2026. I am not asking for minor edits, altered stock holding thresholds, or extended grace periods. I am demanding that the Department withdraw and scrap this policy in its entirety. South Africa’s economy is already under immense pressure, with motorists, businesses, and transport operators struggling to deal with exorbitant fuel prices, high inflation, and sluggish growth. Introducing a heavy-handed, state-mandated fuel stockpiling regime will do nothing to help ordinary citizens. It will simply force fuel prices higher and hand more control to inefficient state institutions. This policy must be thrown out for three primary reasons:
1. It will inevitably increase fuel pump prices for consumers. Forcing private wholesalers and importers to hold a mandatory 21 days of refined products and crude oil is a massive financial burden. Tying up millions of barrels in storage costs real money. The private sector will not simply absorb these capital and operational holding costs. They will pass them directly to everyday consumers at the fuel pump. At a time when South Africans are already struggling to survive, government should be looking for ways to reduce the cost of fuel, not creating policies that guarantee price increases.
2. Expanding state control through state-owned entities is the wrong direction. Placing the South African National Petroleum Company (SANPC) as the central manager and custodian of state reserves, and creating new financial recovery instruments to fund them, is a recipe for fiscal disaster. South Africans have seen time and again what happens when state-owned enterprises are given sweeping operational mandates and taxpayer-backed funding frameworks. We do not need another state apparatus managing billions of rands worth of commodities when market-driven commercial arrangements can manage supply far more efficiently. 3. Government overreach destroys market flexibility and investment. Moving from a flexible, market-based approach to a rigid, mandatory state-monitored regime creates severe red tape. Demanding monthly compliance reports, threatening penalties, and forcing companies to hold rigid percentages of stock distorts the market and disincentivises private investment in our energy value chain. What South Africa's liquid fuels market needs is deregulation, competitive infrastructure access, and economic freedom—not more red tape and state control. In short:This proposed policy will make fuel more expensive, place unnecessary financial strain on the private sector, and expand state interference in a vital industry. Withdraw and scrap the Strategic Petroleum Stock Policy, 2026 completely.
2026-08-18 19:40:01 +02:00
Riana
No I do not
All of the above
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-18 18:20:48 +02:00
Hercules Jacobus
No I do not
Other
2026-08-18 16:19:57 +02:00
Annie
No I do not
Executive Overreach & The Mechanism of Fuel Rationing
2026-08-18 16:14:32 +02:00
Geoff
No I do not
All of the above
National Adequacy and the Total Buffer Volume
2026-08-18 15:56:05 +02:00
Johannes
No I do not
All of the above
Cost of Private Mandatory Storage & Pump Price Pass-Through
The government just want to do nothing! We pay taxes, what are they for? They just want all the money for their own little stupid and not really important objectives. They should concern themselves with building up the nation!
2026-08-18 13:28:49 +02:00
Lydia
No I do not
Market Distortions via State Price-Stability Interventions
Always a sneaky way to make more money to steal

Economic Sovereignty and Survival:
With our major domestic refineries shut down, South Africa is entirely at the mercy of global supply chains. A total fuel failure risks stripping R1 billion per day from our GDP. Building a mandatory national cushion of 81 days (60 days state, 21 days private) is an existential necessity to protect our factories, farms, and transport networks from global shipping crises or wars.

A Shield Against Inflationary Price Spikes:
The economic stability trigger ($145/barrel Brent crude oil auction) creates a necessary regulatory intervention. Instead of allowing international speculative bubbles to trigger runaway hyperinflation at local petrol stations, the government can strategically inject cheaper stockpiled reserves into the market to artificially cap retail fuel prices.

Sharing the Security Burden fairly:
Private oil companies and fuel wholesalers make massive profits from importing products into South Africa. It is unreasonable to expect the taxpayer to fund 100% of the country’s emergency backup buffer. Forcing private industry to carry a 21-day commercial reserve ensures they act as responsible stakeholders in our national energy security.

Predictability in a Crisis:
Moving away from ad-hoc, panic-driven emergency responses to a clearly defined four-tiered trigger system brings structural certainty. Businesses, logistics companies, and State-Owned Enterprises (like Transnet) will know exactly what legal rules apply at every stage of a shortage, reducing market chaos.

Hidden Costs Passed Down to the Consumer:
Forcing private companies to build additional storage infrastructure and tie up millions of Rands in mandatory 21-day “non-operational” fuel reserves will severely strain their cash flows. In a regulated retail price environment, these multi-billion-rand compliance costs will inevitably be passed directly to the public through increased fuel profit margins, worsening the cost-of-living crisis.

Risks of State Monopolization and SOE Mismanagement:
Placing the sole custody of 60 days of state strategic fuel into the hands of the newly formed South African National Petroleum Company (SANPC)—a merger of historically troubled state entities like PetroSA and the Strategic Fuel Fund—raises immediate red flags. Critics fear corruption, structural inefficiency, and procurement irregularities could compromise the actual physical availability of the reserves when a crisis hits.

The Perils of Government-Enforced Fuel Rationing:
Granting the Minister unchecked executive power to declare a Level 3 emergency and legally enforce fuel rationing could create an administrative nightmare. Opponents argue that state-managed rationing systems often result in structural bottlenecks, corruption at point-of-sale, and the immediate emergence of an inflated black market for fuel.

Logistical Nightmares and Spoilage:
Forcing both the state and private sector to rotate finished, refined products like diesel and petrol every three months to prevent chemical degradation is an immense, costly logistical hurdle. If Transnet pipelines or private delivery networks face operational backlogs, millions of liters of emergency backup fuel could potentially degrade, resulting in massive financial losses.