summary

View the Draft Cannabis Bill campaign

Campaign participation report

Download [893.07 KB]

All public comments delivered

Download [0.98 MB]

RECOMMENDED READING IN THE MEDIA

  1. Mail & Guardian — Massive breakthrough in cannabis bill
  2. Businesstech — South Africa is looking at legalising medical marijuana – here’s how it will work
  3. Webber Wentzel  — The new Cannabis for Private Purposes Bill: taking us forward, backward or nowhere at all?
  4. ENSafrica — South African cannabis industry set to take off
  5. EWN — Has It Gone To Pot? Experts Boast Benefits In Letting The Cannabis Industry Grow

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENTS

Revised Bill with insertions (in RED)

Download [491.46 KB]

Cannabis for Private Purposes Bill [B19 – 2020]

Download [100.26 KB]

QR code poster/flyer — download, print, distribute or stick it up!

Download [202.22 KB]

Portfolio meeting 23 March 2022

Portfolio meeting 8 March 2022 – part 1

Portfolio meeting 8 March 2022 – part 2

The Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services (the Committee), having considered the Cannabis for Private Purposes Bill [B 19 – 2020], referred to it and classified by the Joint Tagging Mechanism (JTM) as a section 75 Bill, reports in interim as follows:

  • In Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince 2018 (6) SA 393 (CC), the Constitutional Court declared the following legislative provisions unconstitutional, as they amount to an impermissible limitation of the right to privacy:
    • Section 4(b) (possession) and section 5(b) (dealing on the basis of cultivation) of the Drugs and Drugs Trafficking Act 140 of 1992 (the Drugs Act), read with Part III of Schedule 2 of that Act; and
    • Section 22A(9)(a)(i) of the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act, read with Schedule 7 of Government Notice No. R 509 of 2003.
  • The Court suspended the order of invalidity for 24 months (by 17 September 2020) for Parliament to correct the constitutional defects. Although the 24 months has been exceeded, there is no gap in the law as the Court provided a reading-in provision that ensures that an adult person will not be guilty of a criminal offence if they use, possess or cultivate cannabis for their personal consumption in private.
  • On 1 September 2020, the Cannabis for Private Purposes Bill [B19-2020] was introduced and referred to the Committee for consideration and report.
  • The Committee was briefed on the contents of the Bills on 4 September 2020 and the Bill was then published for public comment.
  • The Committee was also briefed by the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development and the Department of Trade and Industry and Competition on the 25 August 2020 on the draft Cannabis Master Plan, which contains a strategy to industrialise and commercialise cannabis.
  • The Committee received 55 written submissions and held public hearings on 31 August 2021 and 1 and 2 September 2021 on the virtual platform Zoom in which 26 individuals or organisations made oral submissions.
  • The Bill, as introduced, broadly proposes to:
    • Respect the right to privacy of an adult person to possess cannabis plant cultivation material; to cultivate a prescribed quantity of cannabis plants; to possess a prescribed quantity of cannabis; and to consume cannabis;
    • Regulate the possession of cannabis plant cultivation material; the cultivation of cannabis plants; the possession of cannabis; and the consumption of cannabis by an adult person;
    • Protect adults and children against the harms of cannabis;
    • Provide for the expungement of criminal records of persons convicted of possession or use of cannabis;
    • Delete and amend provisions of certain laws; and
    • Provide for related matters.
  • Flowing from the public submissions and its pursuant deliberations, the Committee has identified certain subjects that the introduced Bill does not address and, therefore, in terms of Rule 286(4)(b) of the National Assembly Rules seeks the Assembly’s permission to extend the subject of the Bill to, in addition:
    • Provide for commercial activities in respect of recreational cannabis;
    • Provide for the cultivation, possession and supply of cannabis plants and cannabis by organisations for religious and cultural purposes on behalf of their members; and
    • Respect the right to privacy of an adult person to use cannabis for palliation or medication.

STATEMENTS FROM OTHER ORGANISATIONS

Click on a logo to view.
Want to display your organisation’s statement? Click here. 

en English
af Afrikaansen Englishst Sesothoxh Xhosazu Zulufr Frenchpt Portuguese
Close

Cape Independence Advocacy Group

Dear Speaker,

I am writing to you on behalf of the Cape Independence Advocacy Group (CIAG) and the seventy thousand South Africans who actively follow our work.

We wish to comment on the ‘Electoral Commissions Amendment Act, 2021’, which is proposed by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and was published in the Government Gazette on 21 June 2021.

Given our mandate, our comments are made in the context of the Western Cape, although we appreciate and respect that the constitutional rights enacted through this bill will rightfully apply to all provinces.

This bill is essential to restoring some degree of functional democracy to the voters of the Western Cape and we therefore unreservedly and wholeheartedly endorse it.

Through their voting behaviour, Western Cape voters have made it abundantly clear that they do not endorse many of the policy and ideological positions of the South African national government, but are left utterly powerless to resist them because the voters in other South African provinces, who greatly outnumber them, hold starkly different ideological and political opinions.

In terms of seeing their democratic will enacted, for the majority of Western Cape voters, the democratic era has not offered much of an improvement over the apartheid era. It is a statistical fact that, since 1994, the majority of Western Cape voters have never been governed by the political party they voted for, and they have no foreseeable prospect of ever being governed by the party they vote for. As such, they cannot be said to have functional democracy.

One of the few glimmers of democratic hope Western Cape voters do have, is the provision of Clause 127(2)(f) of the national constitution, and 37(2)(f) of the Western Cape constitution, which allows them, at the discretion of the premier who they elected, to have their voices heard on matters which are important to them, without being drowned out by a national majority who fundamentally hold different views.

To deny Western Cape voters this constitutional right would be a very serious infringement of their political rights and freedoms, and would be a clear indication that parliament and the national government are not interested in the constitutional rights and democratic wishes of Western Cape voters.

We therefore call upon parliament to pass this bill at the earliest opportunity, and without objection.

Yours Faithfully

Phil Craig
(On behalf of the Cape Independence Advocacy Group)