comments

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying the 5 latest comments.

Submitted
first-name
support
concern
top-concern
message
2026-11-09 17:51:15 +02:00
Jane
No I do not
All of the above
5. Scope Ambiguity & Inclusion of Domestic Companion Pets
2026-11-09 17:51:14 +02:00
richard
No I do not
All of the above
4. Unworkable Timelines, Tag Deactivation & Lack of Transitional Rules
firstly i do not know enough about the topic, but i have been a stock owner through the years and some pets as well. i agree that some better control should be in place to help stock theft and disease , but do we have the correct infrastructure in south africa, no i think not. with the current government there will not be enough budget to implement this correctly,. not to mention the corruption. also it will add a huge cost to the farmer witch will then filter down to the already strugling consumer. Pet owners should be allowed to decied to put trackers on or not.
2026-11-09 17:51:12 +02:00
John
No I do not
All of the above
5. Scope Ambiguity & Inclusion of Domestic Companion Pets
2026-11-09 17:51:11 +02:00
Ewalda
No I do not
All of the above
3. Exclusion of Smallholder, Communal, and Emerging Farmers
2026-11-09 17:50:29 +02:00
Sharneen
No I do not
All of the above
5. Scope Ambiguity & Inclusion of Domestic Companion Pets
    • Biosecurity & Disease Traceability
      Double tagging (visual and RFID) and disease-zone colour coding allow veterinary authorities to trace animal movements instantly during Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreaks, preventing nationwide export bans.
    • Stock Theft Mitigation
      Requiring unique identification devices linked directly to registered brand marks and registered holding cards provides law enforcement with definitive proof of ownership to curb rampant stock theft.
    • Smallholder & Rural Impact
      A single national database ensures that all livestock in South Africa—regardless of farm size—meets phytosanitary standards, integrating communal farmers into the formal commercial value chain.
    • Statutory & Legal Soundness
      Section 28 of Act 62 of 1998 gives the Minister broad executive powers to regulate the identification of declared breeds to ensure genetic purity and herd standards.
    • Domestic Pet Inclusion
      Standardising microchips and registration databases protects companion animals, aids recovery, and aligns with international companion animal welfare practices.
    • Biosecurity & Disease Traceability
      Traceability is vital, but centralising it on the cumbersome INTERGIS system without mobile-first, offline-capable field technology will collapse under rural administrative constraints.
    • Stock Theft Mitigation
      Criminal syndicates routinely obliterate tags and falsify papers; penalising legitimate farmers with two years in prison for clerical errors does not stop organised livestock crime syndicates.
    • Smallholder & Rural Impact
      Unfunded compliance mandates (costing R150–R275 per head for tags, readers, and registrations) will wipe out profit margins for subsistence and small-scale livestock owners.
    • Statutory & Legal Soundness
      Act 62 is a breeding and genetics statute. Applying it universally to all livestock creates an unlawful statutory conflict with the Animal Identification Act 6 of 2002, and the 2-year prison penalty is strictly ultra vires.
    • Domestic Pet Inclusion
      Regulating domestic pet dogs and rabbits under an agricultural livestock breeding act is legislative overreach that creates unnecessary public fear of criminal prosecution.