Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 15 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
---|---|---|---|---|
2025-03-17 11:20:42 +02:00 | David | No I do not | Other | The ANC government department has even handled things efficiently. This is just a smoke screen for more disaster, guaranteed. |
2025-03-14 12:48:30 +02:00 | Joseph | No I do not | Other | No government department has even handled things efficiently. This is just a smoke screen for more disaster, guaranteed. |
2025-03-13 19:04:37 +02:00 | Miemie | No I do not | Part II — Definitions | Ek dink hulle moet eerder kontrole oor die wat werk en die wat rus en die wat kyk uitvoer. Hul moet Munisipale bestuur se vermoë toets of hul enigsins bevoeg is om rekeningkunde toe te pas. Mense betaal vir dienste wat hul nie kry nie en dis ok. Ek het 2 sent rente gekry vir laat betataling maak nie saak hoe laat , ek betaal Ek dink hul maak soos hul wil. Is die werker dood wat onlangs in Mangaung geskiet is? Dink jy ek wil soontoe gaan as ek n probleem het? Dink eindtyd is naby, dis net geld,geld,en nogmaals geld. |
2025-03-12 15:36:38 +02:00 | WJ | No I do not | Other | The whole of it concerns me. WHY is this necessary ? |
2025-03-10 19:59:19 +02:00 | Susan | No I do not | Other | NO |
2025-03-10 19:57:40 +02:00 | Susan | No I do not | Other | |
2025-03-10 16:00:59 +02:00 | Leigh | No I do not | Other | Another scheme to take land from the owners and hand it to another person. Land should be marked out for use of certain people that can be used for housing building, schools and used correctly, factories,work created and then employed people to pay taxes, |
2025-03-10 09:36:45 +02:00 | Tumi | No I do not | Part III — Use of land and buildings | |
2025-03-09 10:34:45 +02:00 | Helena | No I do not | Part VII — Land development administration | |
2025-03-07 18:21:15 +02:00 | Piya | No I do not | Other | My concern lies in the content of a single land use scheme that must include economic growth and social inclusion (emphasis premised on integration and inclusion rather than separation of land uses and areas) — an inclusive approach and society means every and all South Africans — not only to ’previously disadvantaged groups due to injustices of the Apartheid era’ — the black South African victimisation mentality fuelled by the ANC led government over the last 30+ years and now the ANC-majority led GNU may now longer use Apartheid as an excuse for their OWN racial discrimination against those marginalised during pre-Democratic SA. Thus, no racial discriminatory policies or practices in the new by-laws for the LUS - meaning: no racist criteria for LUS approvals. |
2025-03-07 14:26:31 +02:00 | Irene | No I do not | Other | This is a noxious Bill as it is a means by which EWC will be slowly ushered in without public consent, knowledge and the opportunity to have a public voice. It will be presented under the auspices of seemingly beneficial state goals which are not atainable. This Bill is simply the state’s first step to attacking and taking away ownership rights of South Africans. A further concern is that as many other administrations are already being mismanaged and misused, there are serious doubts that this one will be managed successfully. We do not want informal settlements within a 10km radius of our properties. Overpopulation in a suburban environment will bring more crime into the area and property values will decrease. The infrastructure can barely cope with the existing number of people as it is . |
2025-03-07 09:18:17 +02:00 | Nic | No I do not | Other | I say NO to this very noxious Bill. It is the way EWC will be slowly ushered in under our noses and under the auspices of seemingly beneficial state goals. This Bill is simply the state’s first step to attacking and taking away ownership rights of South Africans. |
2025-03-06 22:40:05 +02:00 | Lynn | No I do not | Part VII — Land development administration | The concern is that as many other administrations are already being mismanaged, and misused, there are serious doubts that this one will be managed successfully |
2025-03-06 21:14:54 +02:00 | Arnel | No I do not | Other | Do not want informal settlements within 10km radius from my property. It will bring more crime into the area and property values will decrease. The infrastructure can barely manage the existing properties with roads not maintained and traffic lights out with weekly power cuts due to vandalized or faulty cables. |
2025-03-06 20:55:46 +02:00 | Dean | No I do not | Other |