comments3

Advert

Advert – scroll down

Displaying the 30 latest comments.

Submitted
first-name
support
concern
top-concern
message
2026-05-24 16:18:40 +02:00
Retha
No I do not
All of the above
Redundancy: The Bill of Rights is Sufficient
2026-05-24 08:00:23 +02:00
Russel John
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
This would lead South Africa to disaster
2026-05-23 01:06:15 +02:00
Ansu
No I do not
All of the above
Redundancy: The Bill of Rights is Sufficient
2026-05-21 10:37:42 +02:00
Des
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
To whom it may concern,
South African citizens voluntarily gave up their minority government rights to enable the implementation of a broad based democratic transition. Section 235 was a fundamental part of the deal that brought South Africa into this democracy.

I agree with minority rights advocacy groups such as the CAPEXIT Party and Afriforum among others,, that this section forms part of the “negotiated constitutional settlement” intended to accommodate the country’s diversity.

The Constitution 24th Amendment Bill is a move to “shut down” a promise made during the transition, potentially undermining the trust between different communities and the state.

I would urge MKP to focus on building a prosperous South Africa and stop trying to destroy the important fundamental bastions of the present democratic dispensation.
2026-05-21 09:24:41 +02:00
Don
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-21 08:30:02 +02:00
Wesley
No I do not
Democratic Pathways: Closing Peaceful Avenues
MK is a demonic evil party that is built on bribery, corruption, injustice and headed up by a tyrant, communist and dictator name Jacob Zuma. He and many others since the takeover over of South Africa by the ANC since 1994 has absolutely destroyed and bankrupted our country. They have opened up our borders to everyone and looted this country, leaving it broken and the people of South Africa without jobs.
2026-05-21 03:07:11 +02:00
Wayne
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-20 15:45:32 +02:00
Margaretha
No I do not
Democratic Pathways: Closing Peaceful Avenues
2026-05-20 15:01:39 +02:00
david
No I do not
Collective Rights vs. Individual Rights
2026-05-20 10:56:42 +02:00
Nantus
No I do not
All of the above
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-20 08:25:08 +02:00
Jacque
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-20 08:09:17 +02:00
Caren
No I do not
Redundancy: The Bill of Rights is Sufficient
2026-05-20 08:08:32 +02:00
Theresa
No I do not
All of the above
Collective Rights vs. Individual Rights
2026-05-20 05:20:45 +02:00
Rynhardt
No I do not
All of the above
Redundancy: The Bill of Rights is Sufficient
2026-05-19 15:05:34 +02:00
Pau
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
The MK party cannot be trusted at all. Most are trending towards communism and a one party state.
2026-05-19 11:05:15 +02:00
Christopher
No I do not
All of the above
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
The fear of false accusations being spread e.g land was just taken away from us.
The government has thousands of acres undeveloped but that is not is aimed for. They are wanting fully developed land that has taken ,especially farm lands, generations to develop. We need not look further than Zimbabwe to see the results of "land grab".
If this latest action is to proceed, what is the next step forward.
Total disregard of our Constitution?
2026-05-19 06:27:47 +02:00
Jill
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-18 20:40:21 +02:00
Susan
No I do not
All of the above
Democratic Pathways: Closing Peaceful Avenues
Every person has a right to freedom of association.
Removing section 235 reeks of a racist agenda against minorities.
2026-05-18 18:39:33 +02:00
Dioné
No I do not
All of the above
Democratic Pathways: Closing Peaceful Avenues
Citizens may have taken many years to acquire and pay off a property. There should be no risk of your property being taken away from you, with or without compensation. EWC is unacceptable and induces fear and a lack of confidence in government.
2026-05-18 13:56:45 +02:00
Eric
No I do not
All of the above
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-18 06:05:59 +02:00
Hendrika
No I do not
All of the above
Redundancy: The Bill of Rights is Sufficient
2026-05-17 16:39:31 +02:00
Stewart
No I do not
All of the above
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
There will always be peoples or groups of people who want to live their own lifestyles in the country. As long as as they dont cause trouble with the other population they should be allowed to live peacefully
2026-05-17 12:07:58 +02:00
Phlippus
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
2026-05-17 07:00:07 +02:00
Adriaan
No I do not
All of the above
Enclave Risks: Preventing 'Racist Enclaves'
2026-05-15 17:17:36 +02:00
Steven
No I do not
All of the above
Democratic Pathways: Closing Peaceful Avenues
2026-05-15 14:28:12 +02:00
Mrs L
No I do not
All of the above
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
Why would I ever believe the MK party would put forward a proposed change to the Constitution for the benefit of all persons living in South Africa? It is a party motivated by greed and Marxist theory, bending to the dictates of Zuma, his family and followers.
2026-05-15 10:51:23 +02:00
Johan
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
The current constitution is a negotiated "agreement/document" - changes as planned, are with bad intent and by no means respectful
to the agreed upon settlement way back during the period of negotiations.
2026-05-14 09:22:29 +02:00
Gerhard
No I do not
Breach of Trust: The 1994 Negotiated Settlement
The second section doesn't allow me to chose more then one topic. I want to add the next 3 topics following Breach of Trust
2026-05-14 09:07:08 +02:00
Jenny
No I do not
Redundancy: The Bill of Rights is Sufficient
2026-05-13 20:11:58 +02:00
Jadon
No I do not
All of the above
Enclave Risks: Preventing 'Racist Enclaves'
    • Supporters, led by the MK Party, argue that Section 235 is a “dormant” provision that has never been turned into law. They believe it creates a “theoretical basis” for “territorial fragmentation” and allows communities like Orania to operate as “exclusionist enclaves” outside the spirit of a unified South Africa. For them, the Bill of Rights is the only protection needed for cultural and linguistic diversity.
    • Opponents, including the Cape Independence Party and the Freedom Front Plus, argue that Section 235 is a “non-derogable right” and a cornerstone of the 1994 constitutional settlement. They contend that individual rights (Sections 30 and 31) are fundamentally different from the collective right of a community to sustain and govern itself. They warn that removing this “safety valve” will not eliminate the demand for self-determination but will instead push it toward more radical, extra-constitutional paths.