# Summary

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/summary/
- Published: 2019-06-13T13:36:28+02:00
- Author: dearSA

[COMMENT ON THE NEW TAX LAWS](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/taxation-laws-amendment-draft-bill-2019/)

Close

**Error:** Contact form not found.

**I. Background**
 The anti-avoidance rules dealing with dividend stripping were
first introduced in the Income Tax Act (the Act) in 2009. Dividend stripping normally
occurs when a shareholder company that intends to disinvest in a target company 
avoids income tax (including capital gains tax) that would ordinarily arise on the
sale of shares. This is achieved by the shareholder company ensuring that the target
company declares a large dividend to it prior to the sale of shares in that target
company to a prospective purchaser. This pre-sale dividend, which is exempt from
Dividends Tax (in the case of a resident dividend that declares and pays a dividend
to another resident company), decreases the value of shares in the target company.
As a result, the shareholder company can sell the shares at a lower amount, thereby
avoiding a much larger capital gains tax burden in respect of sale of shares.

In 2017, amendments were made in the Act in order to strengthen the anti-avoidance
rules dealing
 with dividend stripping. According to the 2017 changes, exempt dividends
that are regarded as extra-ordinary dividends, received by a shareholder company
are treated as proceeds or income subject to tax in the hands of that shareholder
company, provided that the shares in respect of which extra-ordinary dividends are
received, are disposed of within a period of 18 months prior to that disposal.

Further, in 2018, amendments that were made in 2017 making provision for the anti-
avoidance
 rules dealing with dividend stripping rules to override corporate re-
ogarnisation rules were reversed to ensure that these 2017 amendments do not hinder
legitimate re-organisation transactions.

**II. Reasons for change**
 It has come to Government’s attention that certain taxpayers
have embarked on abusive tax schemes aimed at circumventing the current anti-avoidance
rules dealing with dividend stripping arrangements. These schemes involve millions
of rands and have a potential of eroding the South African tax base. These latest
schemes involve, for example, a substantial dividend distribution by the target 
company to its shareholder company combined with the issuance, by that target company,
of its shares to a third party or third parties. The ultimate result is a dilution
of the shareholder company’s effective interest in the shares of the target company
that does not involve a disposal of those shares by the shareholder company. The
shareholder company ends up, after the implementation of this arrangement, with 
a negligible effective interest in the shares of the target company without triggering
the current anti-avoidance rules. This is because the current anti-avoidance rules
are triggered when there is a disposal of shares while these new structures 5 do
not result in an ultimate disposal of the shares but a dilution of the effective
interest in the target company.

**III. Proposal**
 It was proposed in Annexure C of the 2019 Budget Review that 
amendments should be made to the current anti-avoidance rules to curb the use of
these new dividend stripping arrangements. Furthermore, given the abusive nature
of these arrangements, it was proposed that the amendments should come into effect
from the date of the announcement, which was on the 2019 Annual National Budget 
Day, (i.e. 20 February 2019). This means that the proposed amendments to the legislation
on anti-avoidance rules dealing with dividend stripping will come into effect from
20 February 2019 and apply to dividend stripping schemes entered into on or after
20 February 2019.These legislative interventions will not apply in respect of dividend
stripping schemes entered into before 20 February 2019. In terms of the proposed
amendments the anti-avoidance dealing with dividend stripping rules will operate
as follows:  The anti-avoidance rules will no longer apply only at the time when
a shareholder company disposes of shares in a target company. In addition, the new
anti-avoidance rules will apply to the following anti-avoidance transactions: o 
Shareholder companies will, for purposes of the anti-avoidance rules dealing with
dividend stripping, be deemed to have disposed of and immediately reacquired its
shares in the target company despite them not disposing of their shares, if the 
target company issues shares to another party and the market value of the shares
held by the shareholder company in the target company is reduced by reason of the
shares issued by the target company. o In such an instance, the shareholder company
will be deemed as having disposed of a percentage of the shares it holds in the 
target company immediately after a share issue that results in a decrease in the
value of the shares it holds. The percentage envisaged is the percentage by which
the market value of those shares has been reduced by as a result of the issuance
of shares. As with the current anti-avoidance provisions, the amount to be re-characterised
will be so much of the tax exempt dividends that were received by or accrued to 
the shareholder company within 18 months of the deemed that exceed 15 per cent of
the higher of the market value of the shares in the target company at the beginning
of such 18-month period or market value of the shares held by the shareholder company
in the target company.
