# summary

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/
- Published: 2026-06-09T13:36:04+02:00
- Author: dearSA

_Advert_

_Advert – scroll down_

[ have your say](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/#havasay)

### _Comprehensive Campaign Q&A: Understanding the King David Mowbray Golf Course Redevelopment Dispute_

The Legal Framework & Procedural Sequencing

[What exactly is the City of Cape Town proposing, and what is being decided right now?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1763554389233-fdb8fee6-6da45520-25434ecb-d90b)

The City has released a Draft Development Concept (May 2026) to permanently dispose
of approximately 65 to 74 hectares of well-located public land currently leased 
by the King David Mowbray Golf Course and adjacent sports facilities. The vision
is to build a massive mixed-use precinct consisting of around 8,600 residential 
homes (with a mandate that at least 30% be social/affordable housing) and 75,000
square meters of commercial, retail, and civic space.

Right now, the City is running two public participation processes concurrently until
Monday, 6 July 2026:

 1.  a. A voluntary public engagement on the Draft Development Concept layout itself.
     b. A statutory comment period regarding the Permanent Asset Disposal under the Municipal
        Asset Transfer Regulations (MATR).

[Why are civic groups concerned about the "order of events" in this process?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1763554389265-aa09206a-77665520-25434ecb-d90b)

In standard urban planning, critical technical proofs—such as Environmental Impact
Assessments (EIAs), Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs), Traffic Impact Assessments(
TIAs), and water/sewer utility capacity confirmations—are conducted before land-
use changes are set in stone.

In this campaign, the City’s official documents explicitly list all of these critical
assessments as “future work” to be conducted after the public has already voted 
on and approved the permanent disposal of the land. This means residents are being
forced to sign off on an irreversible transfer of public property before any objective
scientific evidence exists to prove the local environment and utility networks can
handle it.

[What is the issue with Council Resolution C39/05/26 passed on 27 May 2026?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1763554389298-fbc55a3c-817c5520-25434ecb-d90b)

During the initial public engagement round in 2025, the community legally challenged
the City because its original authorizing mandate from October 2024 (Resolution 
C28/10/24) completely failed to cover “Portion B”—which contains the actual golf
course footprint.

Instead of halting the current participation window to rectify the oversight transparently,
the City Council passed a fresh resolution (C39/05/26) on 27 May 2026—the day before
this public round officially launched. Under the Promotion of Administrative Justice
Act (PAJA), changing the statutory and legal baseline behind closed doors mid-stream
or directly at the launch of a public round raises severe questions about procedural
fairness and administrative integrity.

Access to Critical Information & The PAIA Requests

[Why can't the public view the underlying studies for this development?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004323857-ddcf338e-6003)

The City has optimised the promotional materials for the draft concept but has withheld
the baseline municipal data required to evaluate its reality. Essential documents—
such as the land’s professional Valuation Report, the MATR Regulation 7 Feasibility
Study (which legally defines whether the city needs this land for municipal services),
and technical engineering data—have not been published for general access.

[What steps are being taken to unlock these documents?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004323905-9a938f19-c49e)

Formal applications under the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) have
been officially served to four separate City directorates. These include urgent 
applications requiring the City to grant access to the hidden valuation, feasibility,
traffic, and wastewater reports by 20 June 2026.

This timeline means that for the first few weeks of the public participation period,
citizens are effectively being forced to comment in an informational blackout.

Transport Infrastructure & The PRASA Discrepancy

[The City claims this is a "Transit-Oriented Development." What does that mean?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004422142-3b487ee7-778e)

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) is an urban planning strategy that clusters high-
density housing and commercial activities around major public transport hubs (like
train stations or Bus Rapid Transit lines) to ensure residents do not have to rely
on private cars, thereby mitigating traffic congestion.

[What is the "PRASA Contradiction" uncovered by technical reviews?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004422193-286ccb37-a8db)

The entire viability of the City’s high-density model for this site relies on a 
proposed new passenger rail station built to service the 8,600 new households. However,
a formal technical analysis of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
reveals that across three consecutive Corporate Plans—including the most recently
published plan on 30 March 2026—there is absolutely no mention, no budgetary allocation,
and no operational planning for a new station at this location.

Without this non-existent train station, thousands of new commuters will be forced
onto the roads, paralyzing the surrounding M5, N2, and local Pinelands and Mowbray
networks.

Utility Capacity & Wastewater Risks

[Can the local sewer grid support 8,600 new homes?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004520834-26fe4112-0927)

That is currently unproven. The sewage and wastewater generated by the proposed 
precinct is slated to route directly into the Athlone Wastewater Treatment Works(
WWTW). According to the official 2022 Green Drop audit, this facility already suffers
from deep operational compliance challenges and severe capacity strain.

By pushing “sewer-capacity confirmation” to a future phase, the City is bypassing
engineering logic. It is mathematically irresponsible to approve a land disposal
principle before obtaining written, empirical confirmation that the treatment facilities
can handle the structural load without risking a localised infrastructure collapse
or public health crisis.

Environmental & Flooding Dynamics

[How does the location of the golf course impact local flood lines?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004606424-320e2a0c-e3f2)

The King David Mowbray Golf Course is situated directly within a highly sensitive
ecological framework and actively intersects the recognized flood paths of the Black
River. Large open green spaces and golf courses function as natural flood retention
basins during Cape Town’s severe winter storm cycles.

Paving over this land with commercial space and high-density housing blocks will
dramatically reduce permeable soil, increasing the volume and speed of stormwater
runoff. Approving the land disposal before completing a comprehensive, independent
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) leaves the surrounding residential areas of
Pinelands and Mowbray vulnerable to unprecedented flooding risks.

The Core Social Debate

[Does objecting to this process mean opposing affordable and social housing?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004662100-9733cfdb-9070)

Absolutely not. The broader community and civic organizations widely recognize the
urgent necessity for spatial transformation and well-located affordable housing 
in Cape Town.

The civic opposition is centred entirely on procedural safety and infrastructure
capability. Pushing through spatial transformation via a compromised administrative
process that relies on hidden data, unbudgeted train stations, and an overloaded
sewage system is a disservice to both current residents and the future families 
who are being promised well-located homes. True spatial justice requires robust 
infrastructure that is legally verified before a public asset is surrendered.

Campaign Mechanics (DearSouthAfrica vs. Petitions)

[Why shouldn't we just sign a petition with thousands of signatures?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004755632-a6419988-f5ec)

Under South African administrative law, government directorates and municipal councils
are legally permitted to count a petition—regardless of whether it contains 500 
or 50,000 signatures—as a single, symbolic submission. We send each and every public
comment as an individual submission.

[How does participating through DearSA change the legal outcome?](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/#1781004897117-d38afa5b-a653)

Dear South Africa is a legally recognized public participation platform, not a petition
site. Every single comment submitted through this portal is automatically structured,
verified, and sent to the City of Cape Town as an individual statutory submission.

The City is legally compelled by the Constitution and PAJA to read, process, and
independently archive every single submission received through our platform. Furthermore,
the verified data trail we generate forms an unassailable legal record that can 
be used in a High Court review should civil society need to challenge the validity
of the City’s eventual decision.

The draft Development Concept Information Document

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/09133847/Information-Document-King-David-Mowbray-Golf-Course-and-surrounds.pdf)

[Download [5.06 MB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/09133847/Information-Document-King-David-Mowbray-Golf-Course-and-surrounds.pdf)

City of Cape Town presentation

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/09134144/Mowbray_Golf_Course_Public_Meeting_Presentation.pdf)

[Download [5.89 MB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/09134144/Mowbray_Golf_Course_Public_Meeting_Presentation.pdf)

### _In the News_

    - Daily Maverick — [Members for life — The capture of Cape Town’s planning tribunal](https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2026-06-07-members-for-life-the-capture-of-cape-towns-planning-tribunal-/)
    - Full resource site — [The Battle for Mowbray and Pinelands](https://pinelandsmowbraytakeaction.vercel.app/index.html)
    - City of Cape Town — [Have your say on exploring Pinelands/Mowbray site’s development potential and release](https://www.capetown.gov.za/Media-and-news/Have%20your%20say%20on%20exploring%20Pinelands/Mowbray%20site's%20development%20potential%20and%20release)
    - IOL — [Have your say on exploring Pinelands/ Mowbray site’s development potential and release](https://iol.co.za/capeargus/news/2026-05-28-have-your-say-on-exploring-pinelands-mowbray-sites-development-potential-and-release/)
    - The South African — [Battle brewing over plan to redevelop King David Mowbray Golf Course](https://www.thesouthafrican.com/lifestyle/battle-brewing-over-plan-to-redevelop-king-david-mowbray-golf-course/)
    - News24 — [City of Cape Town pushes ahead with golf club redevelopment plan despite public objections](https://www.news24.com/southafrica/news/city-of-cape-town-pushes-ahead-with-golf-club-redevelopment-plan-despite-public-objections-20250718-1239)
    - News24 — [Battle brewing over plan to turn Cape Town golf course into housing precinct](https://www.news24.com/southafrica/news/battle-brewing-over-plan-to-turn-cape-town-golf-course-into-housing-precinct-20260601-1179)
    - Infinity Environmental — [Proposed Redevelopment of Mowbray Golf Course](https://www.infinityenv.co.za/mowbray)

### _Statements and media releases_

Click on a logo to view.

Want to display your organisation’s statement? [Click here. ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/summary/ mowbray@dearsouthafrica.co.za?subject=org info for Mowbray golf Course info page)

Close

### Cape Independence Party

 **CAPEXIT Party strongly opposes the Business Licensing Bill in its entirety on
all points:**

**Preferential licensing**
 The Bill explicitly empowers the Minister to grant licences
on a “preferential” basis and to impose conditions that advance “historically disadvantaged
individuals” or other designated groups. This is nothing less than state-sanctioned
racial and ideological discrimination dressed up as transformation policy.

CAPEXIT rejects the notion that the state has any legitimate role in deciding which
racial or social group may or may not operate a business. Such preferential licensing
will:

    - Reintroduce apartheid-era economic controls under a new ideological banner;
    - Create a cronyist system where access to markets is determined by political
      connections and demographic criteria rather than merit, innovation or consumer
      demand;
    - Discourage both domestic and foreign investment, as investors will rightly
      fear that their businesses can be denied licences or subjected to arbitrary
      conditions on racial or political grounds.

No free society licenses businesses on the basis of the owner’s skin colour or historical
narrative. This clause alone renders the entire Bill unconstitutional and morally
indefensible.

**Principles of business licensing**
 The Bill fails to articulate any coherent,
objective, or proportionate principle for requiring a general business licence in
the first place. Instead, it presumes that every enterprise – from a street vendor
to a multinational corporation – must seek prior permission from the state simply
to exist and trade.

This reverses the fundamental principle of a free economy: citizens should be free
to engage in lawful economic activity without state permission unless there is a
clear, evidence-based justification (e.g. public health, safety or environmental
protection).

The Bill provides no such justification. It is a blanket assault on economic freedom,
reminiscent of the licence-permit raj that crippled India’s economy for decades.
Requiring a general “business licence” in addition to existing sector-specific permits(
liquor, health, zoning, etc.) serves no legitimate public purpose – only the purpose
of expanding state control and creating new opportunities for rent-seeking and corruption.

**Powers of inspectors**
 The Bill grants inspectors extraordinarily broad and invasive
powers, including warrantless entry into private premises, seizure of documents 
and goods, and the ability to close businesses on the spot. These powers are ripe
for abuse and will be weaponised against political opponents, non-compliant businesses,
and any entrepreneur who refuses to pay bribes.

In a country already plagued by corruption scandals, handing unelected officials
the power to enter and shut down businesses without judicial oversight is an open
invitation to extortion. Small businesses, spaza shops, and informal traders – many
of them immigrant-owned – will be particularly vulnerable to harassment and shakedowns.
Far from promoting transformation, this will simply create a new class of “licence
inspectors” who enrich themselves at the expense of the poor.

**More red tape**
 South Africa already ranks poorly on the World Bank’s Ease of
Doing Business index, largely because of regulatory overreach. This Bill adds yet
another layer of costly, time-consuming bureaucracy on top of SARS registration,
municipal permits, B-BBEE compliance, UIF, COIDA, sector SETA requirements, and 
dozens of other licences.

The compliance costs – application fees, mandatory consultations, endless paperwork,
and the risk of arbitrary refusal – will crush startups and force thousands of small
businesses to close or remain informal. Jobs will be lost, investment will flee,
and the tax base will shrink. The Western Cape, which has consistently outperformed
the rest of South Africa precisely because of lighter and more efficient regulation,
will see its competitive advantage deliberately sabotaged by Pretoria.

**Conclusion**
 The Business Licensing Bill is not reform – it is economic sabotage.
It centralises power in the hands of an already overreaching and underperforming
national government, reintroduces racial criteria into commerce, and erects new 
barriers to entrepreneurship at a time when South Africa desperately needs growth
and jobs.

CAPEXIT calls for the complete withdrawal of this Bill. The people of the Western
Cape, and indeed all South Africans who believe in freedom, will not accept a return
to a permit-based economy controlled by bureaucrats and political gatekeepers.

For a free, prosperous, and non-racial future, this Bill must be rejected in its
entirety.