# comments2

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/comments2/
- Published: 2026-06-09T13:59:01+02:00
- Author: dearSA

_Advert_

_Advert – scroll down_

Displaying the **15** latest comments.

[ view more ...](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/comments3/)

  |

Submitted

 |

first-name

 |

support

 |

concern

 |

top-concern

 |

message

 |  
   |

2026-10-27 22:13:55 +02:00

 |

Rashaad

 |

Yes I do

 |

No concern, I Support the Development

 |

 |

 | 
 |

2026-10-20 08:46:43 +02:00

 |

Mighael

 |

Yes I do

 |

No concern, I Support the Development

 |

 |

 | 
 |

2026-10-19 20:01:58 +02:00

 |

Riana

 |

No I do not

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

 |

 | 
 |

2026-10-17 08:33:38 +02:00

 |

Michel

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

The Information Blackout

 |

 | 
 |

2026-10-08 12:18:48 +02:00

 |

Annette

 |

No I do not

 |

Severe Sewer & Utility Grid Strains

 |

 |

Cape Town City does not have everyones interests at heart ---

 | 
 |

2026-10-05 19:35:25 +02:00

 |

Marzanne

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

 | 
 |

2026-10-03 20:50:03 +02:00

 |

Alfred

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals

 |

 | 
 |

2026-09-29 09:12:15 +02:00

 |

imraan

 |

No I do not

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

 |

We are losing too many green spaces. Travelling will become a nightmare, and our current infrastructure will be under more pressure. So do not develop that area..

 | 
 |

2026-09-28 15:45:47 +02:00

 |

Marcelle

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

Severe Sewer & Utility Grid Strains

 |

NO TO RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENT

 | 
 |

2026-09-28 15:25:51 +02:00

 |

Louwra

 |

Yes I do

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

 |

 | 
 |

2026-09-28 14:38:47 +02:00

 |

Colin

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

 | 
 |

2026-09-27 20:36:27 +02:00

 |

Stew

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

Get rid of the squatters.

 | 
 |

2026-09-27 09:55:48 +02:00

 |

Shawn

 |

Yes I do

 |

No concern, I Support the Development

 |

 |

 | 
 |

2026-09-27 08:05:59 +02:00

 |

Ingo

 |

No I do not

 |

Loss of Public Asset

 |

 |

 | 
 |

2026-09-27 07:40:08 +02:00

 |

Gustav

 |

No I do not

 |

All of the above

 |

Irreversible Sequence of Environmental & Heritage Approvals

 |

 |

[The City’s / Proponents' Perspective](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/comments2/#1770892117175-dfc38055-c8382881-c4081842-a34f)

The City maintains that the redevelopment process is entirely “procedurally sound”
following the adoption of Council Resolution C39/05/26 on 27 May 2026. Proponents
argue that the draft concept represents a vital step toward spatial justice, turning
an exclusive recreational area into a vibrant, high-density precinct with 8,600 
homes (minimum 30% social housing). They assert that technical studies, transit 
coordination, and environmental impact assessments will be dealt with thoroughly
in the subsequent legislative phases after the land disposal principle is approved.

[The Community’s / Opponents' Perspective](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/comments2/#1770892117205-3c7c32e1-ce3d2881-c4081842-a34f)

Opponents argue that the City is executing an administrative “bait-and-switch.” 
Asking the public to approve an irreversible public asset disposal while keeping
essential technical studies (valuations, sewer metrics, and TIAs) hidden behind 
PAIA walls violates the basic tenets of fair administrative action under PAJA. Furthermore,
the revelation that PRASA has zero alignment with the City’s transit claims proves
that the project’s planning is prematurely optimised. The community insists that
the public participation process must be halted and restarted only when all baseline
evidence is public and the legal authorisations are genuinely transparent.

[ have your say](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/mowbray-golf-course/#havasay)
