# summary

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/marriage-bill/summary/
- Published: 2023-08-07T14:58:33+02:00
- Author: dearSA

_Advert – scroll down_

[ Have your say on the Marriage Bill](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/marriage-bill/)

The Draft Marriage Bill

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/07145557/48914_7-7_HomeAffairs-4-28.pdf)

[Download [1.06 MB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/07145557/48914_7-7_HomeAffairs-4-28.pdf)

Schedule to the Bill

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/07145627/SCHEDULES.pdf)

[Download [479.65 KB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/07145627/SCHEDULES.pdf)

Encourage participation with this notice – distribute or place at the office

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/07154020/Marriage-Bill-QR-poster.pdf)

[Download [195.53 KB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/07154020/Marriage-Bill-QR-poster.pdf)

Public comments as delivered to parliament

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/10150703/marriagebill.pdf)

[Download [2.53 MB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/10150703/marriagebill.pdf)

Report on the pubic participation

_coming soon_

### STATEMENTS FROM PRIVATE AND CIVIL ORGANISATIONS

Click on a logo to view.

![Click to view ForSA's statement](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/
uploads/2023/04/19160349/forsa-logo-small.png "Click to view ForSA's statement")

![Muslim Women's Forum](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/
03/24165642/image015.jpg "image015")

Want to display your organisation’s statement? [Click here. ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/marriage-bill/summary/ dmb@dearsouthafrica.co.za?subject=org info for Marriage Bill info page)

Close

### Freedom of Religion SA (FOR SA)

 **Introduction**:

FOR SA is aware that the Marriage Bill (which is currently open for comment until
31 August 2023) is garnering much interest, specifically from faith communities.
We recognise that faith communities may have concerns about the Bill that are far
broader than FOR SA’s very specific and narrow mandate, which is to protect and 
promote the constitutional right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief
and opinion (“freedom of religion”). Simply put, this is the right to believe what
you want to believe and to live that belief out freely in public, even if others
think your beliefs are “bizarre, illogical or irrational to others, or are incapable
of scientific proof”. It is also the right not to be forced to do anything contrary
to your beliefs (commonly referred to as the “right to conscientious objection”).
As a legal advocacy organisation we are necessarily faith, doctrine, ideology and
politically neutral.

**FOR SA’s only lens is a religious freedom one:**

As we examine the Marriage Bill, the only perspective FOR SA can give is through
the lens of the right to religious freedom.

 1.  a. Are people free to marry according to their own faith and beliefs?
     b. Will anyone (either the parties getting married or the marriage officer) be forced
        to do anything that is contrary to own their faith and beliefs?

**The current legal context:**

The purpose of the Marriage Bill is to bring together into a single statute, the
different laws that currently govern marriage in South Africa and which already 
cater for different types of marriage relationship. A reform of the fragmented marriage
law regime was needed because certain marriages were not recognised by the State–
such as Islamic marriages that were only concluded according to religious rites 
and not subsequently registered in terms of any one of the laws. As a consequence,
when such a marriage dissolves because of either death or divorce, the surviving
spouse and/or children are unprotected by the law and left vulnerable.

It is also important to note that the Civil Union Act, 2006 contains a gender-neutral
formula (see sec 11) and allows parties to decide whether they want their union 
to be known as a marriage or a civil partnership (see sec 11 of the Act, and specifically
sec (11)(1)). There is also the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, 1998 that
legalises polygamous marriages.

A major religious freedom battle was waged over the Civil Union Amendment Act, 2020
which removed state-employed marriage officers’ right to conscientious objection.
This included Department of Home Affairs employees who are employed as marriage 
officers and even Magistrates. Currently, religious marriage officers who have their
marriage license issued under the Marriage Act, 1961 still have the right to conscientious
objection. This license does not allow them to perform a marriage ceremony for example,
a same-sex couple, for which a license must be issued under the Civil Union Act.

**Understanding the current process:**

In an attempt to resolve these fragmented marriage laws have created, the State 
began with a process to develop a policy (which culminates in a White Paper, which
sets out the official government policy position of the State on the given issues).
The development and finalisation of the policy was subject to a public participation
process and followed by a proposed law (i.e. the Marriage Bill). The development
of the Bill is also subject to a public consultation and participation process, 
commencing with the Department of Home Affairs’ draft of the Bill, which is currently
open for comment until Thursday, 31 August 2023. Thereafter, the Department will
consider the input it has received, and possibly make amendments to the current 
Bill, whereafter it will table the Bill in Parliament. In Parliament, the Bill has
to pass through both Houses – the National Assembly (NA) and the National Council
of Provinces (NCOP), each of which will conduct a public consultation process. Only
after being passed by both houses of Parliament and signed by the President, will
the Marriage Bill become law and will the other existing marriage laws all be repealed(
see Schedule 2).

It is important to note that, in terms of this process, the Department originally
published a draft policy (the Green Paper) for public comment concerning which position
it should take in dealing with the various problems surrounding marriages. In this
Green Paper, various options were proposed for how to deal with marriage officers.
One of the proposals received from stakeholders proposed that Religious Marriage
Officers should be forced to solemnise all marriages, irrespective of whether or
not such unions were in line with their or their religious organisations’ faith 
and beliefs (see page 24 of the Green Paper). For example, a Roman Catholic priest
could have been forced to marry an excommunicated divorcee. This was a massive concern
for FOR SA because it would have fundamentally eroded religious freedom. Churches
would have lost the ability to decide what they believe the Bible says marriage 
is, including pastors’ right to not be forced to do anything against their faith.

Thankfully, as a result of the public’s engagement with the Department on the draft
policy, the Department’s final policy, titled the White Paper on Marriage in South
Africa, solved this problem by recommending the expansion of the category of who
can apply to become a marriage officer. This means that no one should be forced 
to do anything that goes against their conscience, religion or belief. It further
recommended that state-employed marriage officers will not perform any ceremonial(
i.e. religious) functions generally associated with the solemnisation of a marriage.

‍FOR SA viewed the final version of the policy as a big win for religious freedom
because people are free to marry according to their faith and no one will be forced
to do anything that is contrary to their faith.

**The Marriage Bill:**

The first version of the Marriage Bill has now been published by the Department 
for public comment. The Bill proposes, amongst other things, the minimum requirements
for a marriage to be concluded (age, consent and legal capacity); expands who can
be a marriage officer (allowing anyone holding a responsible position in an organisation
to apply); makes provision for a marriage officer to solemnise a marriage in accordance
with any practice (and therefore does not contain a marriage formula); and recognises
all existing marriages even if they were not included in terms of the fragmented
laws. When it comes to polygamous marriages, these remain between a husband and 
wives, with the husband having to obtain his existing wives’ consent before taking
another wife etc.

This draft will likely be changed after public consultation is completed and before
it is tabled in Parliament, whose two Houses will respectively open it up for comment
again. FOR SA’s opinion – from a religious freedom perspective – is that this first
draft Bill is good (although not perfect), precisely because it captures the policy
position set out in the White Paper. It does not expressly force religious marriage
officers to solemnise unions that go against their faith (which was a big threat).

Nevertheless – and to ensure that the right to religious freedom in the Bill is 
properly respected, strengthened and upheld, FOR SA is proposing the following changes:

 1.  a. The inclusion of a clause that expressly protects the religious freedom of Religious
        Marriage Officers (i.e. pastors, imams etc. who do not work for the State and 
        voluntarily hold marriage licences) and the religious organisations (e.g. churches,
        mosques, temples etc.) to whom they belong. This will ensure that the Bill complies
        both with the Constitution and international law.
     b. That the Bill be clarified to expressly states that Civil Marriage Officers will
        not be obliged to perform any ceremonial (i.e. religious) functions generally 
        associated with the solemnisation of a marriage.
     c. And changes to certain clauses to avoid a potential problem and confusion in the
        current draft of this Bill, which could unintentionally criminalise religious 
        leaders who solemnise the religious ceremony only (and not the legal aspect of
        the marriage).

**FOR SA continues to encourage everyone to have their say on the Bill before Thursday,
31 August 2023.**

Close

### Muslim Women's Forum

### **FOR SA’s** VIEW OF (AND RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO) THE MARRIAGE BILL

**YES/NO/NOT FULLY**

FOR SA is generally happy that this draft of the Marriage Bill reflects the Marriage
Policy. However, we do have three religious freedom concerns with the current draft.
We would therefore ask you to support the following changes we recommend are made
to this Bill to ensure that the right to religious freedom is properly upheld and
protected.

_To help you to give reasons for the changes that you are supporting in the relevant
field, you may like to copy/paste one or more of the following;_

 1.  a. I support the submission made by Freedom of Religion South Africa **(FOR SA).**
     b. I specifically support the inclusion of a clause that expressly protects the religious
        freedom of Religious Marriage Officers (i.e. pastors, imams etc. who do not work
        for the State and voluntarily hold marriage licences) and the religious organisations(
        e.g. churches, mosques, temples etc.) to whom they belong. This will ensure that
        the Bill complies both with the Constitution and international law.
     c. I specifically support the inclusion of a clause that expressly states that Civil
        Marriage Officers will not be obliged to perform any ceremonial (i.e. religious
        functions) generally associated with the solemnisation of a marriage.
     d. I am concerned that the current draft of this Bill could unintentionally criminalise
        religious leaders who solemnise the religious ceremony only. I therefore specifically
        support the inclusion of a clause to avoid this potential problem and confusion.

### In the Media

 * The Conversation — [South Africa’s new Marriage Bill raises many thorny issues – a balancing act is needed](https://theconversation.com/south-africas-new-marriage-bill-raises-many-thorny-issues-a-balancing-act-is-needed-210343)
 * TimesLIVE — [Draft marriage bill will criminalise underage unions](https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2023-07-15-draft-marriage-bill-will-criminalise-underage-unions/)
 * EWN — [NEW BILL AIMED AT BRINGING ALL MARRIAGES UNDER ONE LAW GAINING MOMENTUM](https://ewn.co.za/0001/01/01/new-bill-aimed-at-bringing-all-marriages-under-one-law-gaining-momentum)
 * ENCA — [MIXED REACTION TO NEW MARRIAGE AMENDMENT BILL](https://www.enca.com/news/mixed-reaction-new-marriage-amendment-bill)
 * BusinessTech — [Big changes to marriage laws in South Africa moving forward](https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/698195/big-changes-to-marriage-laws-in-south-africa-moving-forward/)
 * Mossel Bay Advertiser —[ HAVE YOUR SAY ON DRAFT MARRIAGE BILL](https://www.mosselbayadvertiser.com/News/Article/National/have-your-say-on-draft-marriage-bill-202307111237)
 * Dispatch LIVE — [Draft marriage bill will criminalise underage unions](https://www.dispatchlive.co.za/news/2023-07-15-draft-marriage-bill-will-criminalise-underage-unions/)
 * BusinessTech — [Changes to marriage laws in South Africa – what to expect this year](https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/678055/changes-to-marriage-laws-in-south-africa-what-to-expect-this-year/)

Public hearings on the proposed Marriage Bill which would create a unified system
for the various types of marriages in South Africa have ended in Gauteng. During
the consultation process, some religious leaders and cultural activists argued against
some of the provisions of the bill such as same-sex marriage and polyandry. Attorney
Kamal Natha unpacks this.

The new Marriage Amendment Bill has been receiving mixed signals. The bill seeks
to rationalise pieces of legislation dealing with marriage and ensure that all persons,
regardless of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, religious or cultural beliefs,
are treated equally and with dignity. But Associate Professor at the **Department
of Private Law at University of Western Cape, Anthony Diala, says there are many
thorny issues in the bill.**

The new Marriage Amendment Bill has been receiving mixed signals. The bill seeks
to rationalise pieces of legislation dealing with marriage and ensure that all persons,
regardless of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, religious or cultural beliefs,
are treated equally and with dignity. But Associate Professor at the **Department
of Private Law at University of Western Cape, Anthony Diala, says there are many
thorny issues in the bill.**
