# BELA Regulations

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/
- Published: 2026-08-09T11:57:59+02:00
- Author: dearSA

![BELA Act Draft Regulations (2026): Have Your Say on School Governance, Extra Teacher
Pay, & Infrastructure Norms](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/
2026/08/09113620/BELA-ACT-regulations-header-scaled.jpg "BELA ACT regulations header")

![DEAR-SOUTH-AfFRICA](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/
02/08135845/DEAR-SOUTH-AfFRICA.png "DEAR-SOUTH-AfFRICA")

0

comments individually delivered to the Minister

       * No I do not support the regulations 2168
       * Yes I do 85
       * Not fully 299

### Following the enactment of the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) framework, Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube gazetted four key regulatory instruments for public commentary.

These draft regulations move the BELA Act from high-level law into daily, on-the-
ground reality across South Africa’s 22,000+ public schools. They directly impact
how School Governing Bodies (SGBs) are elected, whether SGBs can pay teachers for
extra coaching or weekend classes, how underperforming SGBs are managed, and how
teacher development centres are built and run.
 click the link for more info

[ view a campaign report and all public comments](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/summary)

## Have your say – shape the regulations. [CLOSED] 

**Do you support the proposed BELA Act draft regulations on SGB elections, Section
38A teacher remuneration, and teacher development norms as presented by the Minister?**

**What is your concern? (scroll down for an explanation of each) **

As you've chosen "all of the above", if you had to choose one concern, what would
it be?

the fields below are optional ——————————

**What is your preferred channel for feedback on this campaign?**

**Your preferred language?**

**What is your status? (for our reporting purposes only) **

 **Check your email address then hit send! You will be redirected to a confirmation
page. **

![D-icon](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/11192438/
D-icon-40x40-1.png "D-icon-40x40")

### _Top concerns_

To help you choose the option that best reflects your concern, here is a detailed
breakdown of each Primary Area of Concern in the Question 2 dropdown.

[SGB Autonomy & Section 38A Extra Pay Restrictions](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1770131112026-5a70eb21-10f15d6a-e1cd1d69-9490)

    - _What it means:_
       Focuses on state restrictions on the independent power of
      School Governing Bodies (SGBs) to compensate state-employed teachers or administrative
      staff for additional work (such as afternoon sports coaching, weekend extra
      classes, or cultural activities).
    - _Key Draft Provisions:_
       Draft Notice 7796 (Section 38A Regulations) prohibits
      SGBs from paying any extra money, financial benefit, or benefit-in-kind to
      state employees without submitting a formal application (Form 1) and securing
      advance written permission from the provincial Head of Department (HoD).

_Why choose this: _
 If you believe democratically elected parent bodies should 
retain the local autonomy and flexibility to reward dedicated staff for extra effort
without state interference or bureaucratic vetoes.

[Administrative Delays (3-Month HoD Approval Window)](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1770131112043-0e75ef86-4b6c5d6a-e1cd1d69-9490)

    - _What it means:_
       Focuses on the logistical bottleneck caused by forcing SGBs
      to wait up to a quarter of a year for provincial departmental decisions before
      extra pay or programs can be authorized.
    - _Key Draft Provisions:_
       Regulation 5(2) of Draft Notice 7796 grants the provincial
      HoD up to three (3) months from the date of application receipt to approve
      or reject a Section 38A extra pay request.

_Why choose this:_
 If you are concerned that a 90-day waiting window will paralise
school calendars, delay sports seasons and academic catch-up programs, and burden
both schools and provincial departments with excessive red tape.

[Digital Exclusion & Security Risks in SGB E-Voting](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1770131281853-5866958a-b51c5d6a-e1cd1d69-9490)

    - _What it means: _
       Focuses on the potential inequalities and technical vulnerabilities
      introduced by modernizing SGB elections through remote or digital voting platforms.
    - _Key Draft Provisions:_
       Draft Notice 7797 (SGB Election Regulations) introduces
      the E-Election Method, allowing public schools with requisite technical capacity
      to conduct remote digital voting, subject to technological readiness assessments
      and POPIA data compliance.

_Why choose this:_
 If you worry that parents in under-resourced or rural communities
without reliable internet, smartphones, or data will be disenfranchised, or if you
have concerns regarding cyber-security and secret ballot verification in online 
elections.

[HoD Powers to Dissolve Underperforming SGBs](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1770131323251-266a4851-6c9c5d6a-e1cd1d69-9490)

    - _What it means:_
       Focuses on the balance of power between elected parent representatives
      and provincial education officials regarding state intervention in school 
      governance.
    - _Key Draft Provisions:_
       Draft Notice 7797 outlines formal procedures authorizing
      the provincial HoD to dissolve an SGB that fails to perform its statutory 
      duties, appoint interim managers, and assume temporary control over school
      governance.

_Why choose this:_
 If you believe granting provincial officials broader powers 
to dissolve SGBs risks centralising control, politically interfering in local school
governance, or overriding parent voting mandates without sufficient independent 
judicial checks.

[Focus on Physical Buildings vs. Direct Teacher Support](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1786269169423-95b4780a-ba9f)

    - _What it means:_
       Focuses on the policy shift toward establishing physical
      spatial norms for training institutes rather than providing immediate, in-
      classroom support to educators.
    - _Key Draft Provisions:_
       Draft Notices 7795 & 7798 set binding spatial square-
      meterage norms, ICT lab requirements, alternative power specs (solar/generators),
      and perimeter fencing for Provincial Institutes (PTDIs) and District Centres(
      DTDCs).

_Why choose this:_
 If you feel that establishing spatial standards for training
facilities misses the primary mark—arguing that state funding and resources should
go directly toward in-classroom teacher support, reducing class sizes, providing
teaching materials, and relieving overworked educators.

[General Support for Standardisation & Financial Oversight](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1777463528421-99209505-be9a1d69-9490)

    - _What it means:_
       Focuses on the positive benefits of national legal uniformity,
      corruption prevention, and modernized facility standards across the public
      schooling ecosystem.
    - _Key Draft Provisions:_
       Covers the overarching principles across all four
      gazette notices (Notices 7795, 7796, 7797, 7798), creating single national
      standards for SGB elections, Section 38A financial disclosures, and dignified,
      pit-latrine-free educator training facilities.

_Why choose this:_
 If you agree with the Minister’s objective to eliminate double-
dipping, prevent wealthy schools from inflating state salary gaps, ensure tax compliance,
boost election turnout, and guarantee modern, dignified spaces for teacher development.

### _Perspectives: What is the debate?_

_Supporters argue:_ These regulations bring much-needed financial integrity, stop
salary inflation discrepancies between rich and poor public schools, modernise parent
election turnouts via e-voting, and ensure teacher training facilities meet dignified
standards.

_Critics argue:_ Requiring a 3-month state approval process before an SGB can pay
teachers for weekend tutoring or afternoon sports coaching creates administrative
paralysis. Others express concern that e-voting could disenfranchise parents without
data or smartphones, and that setting building norms does not address educator workload
inside crowded classrooms.

[Section 38A Teacher Pay](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1770892117175-dfc38055-c8385d6a-e1cd1d69-9490)

    - What Supporters Say
       _Closes corruption loopholes & stops double-dipping: 
      _Prevents wealthy schools from privately inflating state salaries, ensures
      tax compliance, and protects public funds from unauthorised bonuses.
    - What Opponents Say
       _Creates administrative paralysis:_ A 3-month HoD waiting
      period for sports or extra math classes stifles extracurriculars and penalizes
      dedicated teachers who go above and beyond.

[SGB Elections & E-Voting](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1770892117205-3c7c32e1-ce3d5d6a-e1cd1d69-9490)

    - What Supporters Say
       _Modernises participation:_ E-voting and flexible day
      polling increase parent voter turnout and standardise handover procedures 
      between outgoing and incoming SGBs.
    - What Opponents Say
       _Exacerbates the Digital Divide:_ Rural or low-income 
      parent communities risk digital exclusion due to data costs, poor connectivity,
      or lack of smartphone access.

[SGB Dissolution Powers](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1786269872900-9f0dc027-a70f)

    - What Supporters Say
       _Ensures functional accountability:_ Authorises the HoD
      to intervene and dissolve failing or dysfunctional SGBs while appointing interim
      management.
    - What Opponents Say
       _Infringes on local SGB autonomy:_ Concentrates power 
      in provincial bureaucracies, potentially undermining community-led governance
      and parental rights.

[Teacher Development Norms](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1786269948826-195a6f8b-374c)

    - What Supporters Say
       _Establishes dignified, modern spaces:_ Guarantees universal
      disability access, backup power, digital libraries, and eradicates pit toilets
      at training institutes.
    - What Opponents Say
       _Focuses on bricks rather than support:_ Building spatial
      norms does not solve educator burnout, excessive admin burdens, or large classroom
      sizes in real schools.

### _Suggested Public Responses (For & Against)_

[Option A: In Favour / Support (Suggested Submission Text)](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1786270168254-ba9b6448-bc88)

_I write to express my overall SUPPORT for the draft regulations published under
the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act framework._

 1.  a. _Financial Accountability (Section 38A): _
         I support the strict regulation of
        additional remuneration paid by SGBs to state employees. Requiring prior HoD approval,
        hourly time logs, and clear Section 38A school policies prevents the unauthorized
        misapplication of school funds, ensures tax compliance, and eliminates unfair 
        salary discrepancies between schools.
     b. _Modernized SGB Elections (Notice 7797): _
         I welcome the formalization of e-voting
        and flexible day polling methods, which will significantly improve parent participation
        and voter turnout. The mandatory handover templates protect institutional memory
        when new SGBs take office.
     c. _Dignified Educator Infrastructure (Notices 7795 & 7798):_
         Setting binding spatial
        standards, universal disability access, and explicitly banning pit latrines at
        teacher training facilities is an essential step toward professionalizing educator
        support in South Africa.

[Option B: Object / Conditional Support (Suggested Submission Text)](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/#1786270168320-dccc9a9c-b826)

_While I acknowledge the need for standardized school governance, I OBJECT to specific
overreaching aspects of the draft regulations and urge the Minister to make the 
following critical amendments:_

 1.  a. _Reduce the 3-Month Section 38A Approval Window:_
         The proposed 3-month waiting
        period for HoD authorization under Regulation 5(2) is completely unworkable. Requiring
        an SGB to wait up to a quarter of a year to pay educators for coaching sports,
        music lessons, or weekend academic catch-up sessions will paralyze extra-curricular
        programs. _Amendment Request:_ The approval window must be shortened to 30 calendar
        days, with a provision that failure by the HoD to respond within 30 days constitutes
        automatic temporary approval.
     b. _Protect SGB Autonomy & Avoid Centralization:_ The regulations grant excessive
        administrative oversight to provincial education departments over routine SGB 
        functions. SGBs are elected by parents and must retain the operational flexibility
        to manage extra duties without excessive red tape.
     c. _Safeguard Against Digital Exclusion in E-Voting:_ Notice 7797 must explicitly
        guarantee that schools adopting e-voting maintain accessible physical voting alternatives
        so that parents without internet access, data, or smartphones are not disenfranchised.
     d. _Prioritise In-Classroom Educator Relief:_ Physical infrastructure norms for district
        training centres must be matched by immediate, practical support for educators
        inside overcrowded classrooms.

[ View more info](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/bela-regulations/summary)
