Advert
Advert – scroll down
Displaying the 5 latest comments.
Submitted | first-name | support | top-concern | message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-07-11 04:36:24 +02:00 | Nosipho | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-07-11 03:30:38 +02:00 | Carl | No I do not | Constitutional issues | |
2026-07-11 02:47:23 +02:00 | Gideon | No I do not | Weaponising laws | Islam is weaponising law to promote their global acts of terrorism and going against my choice of freedom of religion. This is a first attempt of what is going on as example in Nigeria to kill persons that have other faiths than Islam. |
2026-07-11 02:09:21 +02:00 | Kotie | No I do not | Constitutional issues | I should have the right to practise a freedom of choice as far as my religion is concerned |
2026-07-11 01:51:40 +02:00 | Llewellyn | No I do not | Constitutional issues | It is my constitutional right to practice my religion and faith freely. As a Christian I cannot exclude Israel or Jesus Christ. |
Summary of Opposing Views
Supporters (Al Jama-ah, ANC, EFF, PAC, GOOD):
Argue the Bill is a moral necessity to close the “impunity gap” and align South African law with its international commitments (ICJ case, UN Convention).
Opponents (DA, FF+, Jewish Board of Deputies):
Likely to argue the Bill is constitutionally vague, practically unenforceable, and a waste of parliamentary resources intended solely to antagonise Israel.