# summary

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/alcohol-taxes/summary/
- Published: 2025-01-02T15:41:53+02:00
- Author: dearSA

_Advert_

_Advert – scroll down_

[ Have your say on Alcohol Tax](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/alcohol-taxes/)

THE TAXATION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/02153959/241113taxation_of_alcoholic_beverages.pdf)

[Download [1.12 MB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/02153959/241113taxation_of_alcoholic_beverages.pdf)

NOTICE

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/02154133/241113Media_Statement_-_Publication_of_discussion_documents_for_public_comment.pdf)

[Download [328.92 KB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/02154133/241113Media_Statement_-_Publication_of_discussion_documents_for_public_comment.pdf)

### In the Media

    - BusinessTech — [Big changes for alcohol in South Africa in 2025](https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/799658/big-changes-for-alcohol-in-south-africa-in-2025/)
    - Harpers UK — [South African government proposes ‘drastic excise tax increases’ on wine](https://harpers.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/33515/South_African_government_proposes__drastic_excise_tax_increases__on_wine.html)
    - The Conversation — [South Africa wants to make alcohol more expensive. Why it’s a good idea – health economist](https://theconversation.com/south-africa-wants-to-make-alcohol-more-expensive-why-its-a-good-idea-health-economist-244852)
    - Moonstone — [Concerns about proposed tax policy framework for alcohol industry](https://www.moonstone.co.za/concerns-about-proposed-tax-policy-framework-for-alcohol-industry/)
    - Indlovu — [How South Africa’s New Booze Tax is Shaking Up the Spirits: A Sip of Economic Reality](https://ibhu.co.za/how-south-africas-new-booze-tax-is-shaking-up-the-spirits-a-sip-of-economic-reality/)

**eNCA** — Treasury wants to increase tax on alcohol

**Newzroom Afrika** Interview – Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) on alcohol

**Satori News** — SAB Raises Alarm Over Excessive Excise Tax Impact on South African
Beer Industry and Economy

### STATEMENTS AND MEDIA RELEASES

Click on a logo to view.

Want to display your organisation’s statement? [Click here. ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/alcohol-taxes/summary/ rhino@dearsouthafrica.co.za?subject=org info for Conservation info page)

Close

### Freedom of Religion SA (FOR SA)

 TEMPLATE PROVIDED BY FOR SA

### I strongly oppose the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Bill [B9B – 2018], which I believe to be unconstitutional and unnecessary, for the following reasons:

 1. The Bill violates our constitutional rights as religious persons to express our
    religious beliefs without fear of punishment or persecution (section 15, read with
    section 16). Increasingly, around the world but also in South Africa, various holy
    scriptures (particularly on contentious issues) are regarded as “politically incorrect”
    or “offensive”, allegedly causing emotional and/or social harm.
 2. I specifically oppose the Bill’s:
 3.  a. wide definition of “harm” (in Clause 1);
     b. the failure to define “hatred” (in Clause 1); and
     c. definition of, and creation of, the crime of “hate speech” (in Clause 4).
 4. The creation of the crime of “hate speech” for saying / distributing something 
    which could possibly be construed as “harmful”, will have certain unintended consequences,
    namely the criminalisation of good / well-meaning people who will be prosecuted
    for saying what they sincerely believe (according to their holy texts) and sent
    to jail.
 5. There are already sufficient existing laws dealing with “hate speech”.
 6. For all of the reasons given, I ask:
 7.  a. For the scrapping of the “hate speech” sections from the Bill altogether;
     b. Alternatively, should the “hate speech” provisions remain part of the Bill, we
        ask:
     c.  a. That “harm” be defined as: “gross emotional and psychological detriment that 
            objectively and severely undermines the human dignity of the targeted group”;
            and
         b. That “hatred” be defined as: “strong and deeply-felt emotions of enmity, ill-
            will, detestation, malevolence and vilification against members of an identifiable
            group, that implies that members of that group are to be despised, scorned, denied
            respect and subjected to ill-treatment based on their group affiliation”.
     d. That Clause 4(2)(d) (the “religious exemption clause”) be strengthened as follows
        to protect:
         _“expression of any religious conviction, tenet, belief, teaching,
        doctrine or writings, by a religious organisation or an individual, in public 
        or in private, to the extent that such expression does not actively support, instigate,
        exhort, or call for extreme detestation, vilification, enmity, ill-will and malevolence
        that constitutes incitement to cause gross emotional and psychological harm that
        severely undermines the dignity of the targeted group, based on race, ethnicity,
        gender, religion or sexual orientation”._