# Dear South Africa asks high court to set aside latest lockdown

- Link: https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/2020/11/17/dear-south-africa-asks-high-court-to-set-aside-latest-lockdown/
- Published: 2020-11-17T12:06:56+02:00
- Author: dearSA

### Intro: The lockdown restrictions are illogical and are done without Parliamentary oversight

Participative democracy group Dear South Africa has filed an urgent application 
in the Pretoria High Court to set aside the lockdown extension imposed on 13 November
2020.

The court application says the lockdown extensions are illogical and are being done
without Parliamentary oversight, as required by the Constitution.

[view DearSA's founding affidavit ](http://hurterspies.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Dear-SA-Unlockdown-Founding-Papers-2.pdf)

[view PANDA's founding affidavit ](https://www.pandata.org/wp-content/uploads/201123-Application-Panda-Knowledge-Factory-NPC-amicus-curiae-compressed-min.pdf)

[SUPPORT THIS ACTION NOW ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/unlockdown/)

[view the Minister's notice to oppose ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/20190840/NOTICE-TO-OPPOSE.pdf)

![NDZ-state of disaster - DearSA](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/
2020/11/20190840/NDZ-state-of-disaster-DearSA.jpg "NDZ-state of disaster - DearSA")

The only respondent in the case is the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional
Affairs, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma. She has until 18 November 2020 to oppose the matter.

Dear South Africa is also asking the court to declare the latest lockdown extension
under the Disaster Management Act unlawful.

“South Africa is no longer faced with the uncertainties that it was confronted with
when the initial state of disaster was enacted,” says Daniel Eloff of Hurter Spies,
the attorneys representing Dear South Africa. “Consequently, government cannot continue
to piggyback on a state of disaster for which the underlying and motivating reason
has largely dispersed eight months since the initial declaration of the national
state of disaster.”

In an affidavit before the court, Dear South Africa director Rob Hutchinson argues
that Constitutional rights have been curtailed by the disaster regulations, including
the rights to freedom of movement, residence, assembly, economic activity and education.

Businesses were shut down at the start of the Covid lockdown, schools were closed,
and citizens’ rights to move and practice their professions and trades were severely
curtailed.

“While many of these restrictions on fundamental rights have been lifted, the (minister)
has imposed these restrictions without parliamentary oversight and may reimpose 
them. The (minister) is empowered to extend the state of disaster monthly _ad infinitum
_without such oversight,” says the court application.

Regulations under the act may only be made to: protect or provide relief to the 
public; protect property; prevent or combat disruption; deal with the destructive
and other effects of the disaster.

The original purpose of the lockdowns which commenced in March 2020 was to “flatten
the curve” and slow the spread of the Covid-19 virus. Little was known about the
virus at the time. Now we know much more.

Lockdowns will not save the lives of those who contract COVID-19 and do not require
hospitalisation, according to Dear South Africa. Expert analysis by medical experts
and epidemiologists conclude that the case fatality rate from the virus is 0% for
those under 19, and for adults under 50 it is 0.5%.

The case fatality rate for SA is 2.7%. The World Health Organisation (WHO) noted
on 22 October 2020 that 10% of the world’s population were reckoned to have been
infected with the virus. Of these, 1.3 million people have died as of 14 November
2020, an infection fatality rate of 0.17%.

The lockdown measures have had a devastating impact on the SA economy. During April,
May and June, when the most severe lockdown restrictions were in place, gross domestic
product contracted by more than 16% giving an annualised decline of -51%. By comparison,
in 2009, during the global financial crisis, the annualised decline was -6.1%. In
the second quarter of 2020 alone, SA shed 2.2 million jobs, according to StatSA.

The South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA) provided
models to the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), though it was
not aware that these models were being used to inform policy. SACEMA abandoned its
model soon after it was published and advised that it was not a tool for decision-
making. That model’s replacement, the NICD’s “Epi Model” has not been updated since
June 2020 and also appears to have been abandoned. When last updated, it forecast
40 000 deaths by the end of November 2020 – which has also proven to be wildly inaccurate.
The actual number of fatalities currently sits at just above 20 000.

South Africans appear to have a high level of compliance with recommended rules 
regarding sanitation, wearing of masks and social distancing.

Dear South Africa says the recent extension of the lockdown is an “administrative
act” which is reviewable by a court in terms of the Promotion of Administrative 
Justice Act (PAJA). Reasons given for seeking to set aside and declare the extension
unlawful include:

 * They were not rationally connected to the purpose for which they were taken
 * Irrelevant considerations were taken into account, or relevant considerations
   ignored
 * The extension is unconstitutional and unlawful.

While it may have been rational to have declared a state of disaster in March, much
has changed since then. It is no longer rational to have the declaration in place
and it should not have been extended.

The state of disaster grants the executive the power to pass draconian legislation
which weakens the rights of all those who live in South Africa. The state of disaster
can be extended _ad infinitum_ by the minister without a requirement of parliamentary
oversight. This has occurred, and continues to occur, which undermines our constitutional
democracy, premised on a genuine separation of powers, says the court application.

If a second wave of infections occurs, the state has had ample time to prepare for
this and a new state of disaster could be declared based on new circumstances that
may arise. “It is improper to keep the current state of disaster perpetually in 
force on the basis that some new disaster may occur on some unknown date,” says 
the application.

Letter to Minister Dlamini-Zuma (current challenge)

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/2020/11/17/dear-south-africa-asks-high-court-to-set-aside-latest-lockdown/#)

[Download [164.29 KB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/20190900/Letter-to-Minister-of-Cooperative-Governance-and-Traditional-Affairs-dated-20-October-2020.pdf)

First letter (challenge successful)

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/2020/11/17/dear-south-africa-asks-high-court-to-set-aside-latest-lockdown/#)

[Download [388.43 KB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/20191052/Letter-to-Minister-of-Cooperative-Governance-and-Traditional-Affairs-dated-8-May-2020.pdf)

Second letter (challenge successful)

 ⌊Loader⌉ Loading...

 ⌊EAD Logo⌉ Taking too long?

 ⌊Reload⌉ Reload document

 | [ ⌊Open⌉ Open in new tab ](https://dearsouthafrica.co.za/2020/11/17/dear-south-africa-asks-high-court-to-set-aside-latest-lockdown/#)

[Download [224.15 KB] ](https://cdn.dearsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/20191050/Letter-to-Minister-of-Basic-Education-dated-12-May-2020.pdf)
